Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

January 26, 1999 · Cessna 172L · N7639G

Santa Paula, CA

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
January 26, 1999
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (2 uninjured)
Location
Santa Paula, CA
Aircraft
Cessna 172L
Tail Number
N7639G
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
LAX99LA082

Basic instrument flight maneuvers were practiced on the dual instrument instructional flight. The pilot under instruction was given a series of headings, altitudes, and airspeeds to fly. These vectors terminated in the airport traffic pattern and when the pilot under instruction removed his vision restricting device, the airplane was on final approach close to the runway and left of centerline. The pilot under instruction stated that he would have gone around if he were alone and stated this to the instructor. The instructor then took control of the airplane and a landing was attempted. Witnesses said the touchdown was approximately halfway down the wet 2,650 foot-long-runway. The pilots said they felt there was no apparent braking, especially from the right brake. The airplane departed the runway, traveled through a muddy overrun area, then back onto a taxiway and into a block wall. Two skid marks were evident before and after the overrun area. The brakes were functionally checked after the accident with no discrepancies found.

NTSB Probable Cause

The instructor pilot's misjudged altitude and speed, which resulted in a failure to attain the proper touchdown point causing an overrun and collision with a block wall. A factor was the wet runway, which may have hindered brake effectiveness.

Full Narrative

On January 25, 1999, about 1630 hours Pacific standard time, a Cessna 172L, N7639G, collided with a block wall during a landing overrun at the Santa Paula, California, airport. The rented airplane was being operated by the Oxnard Flying Club under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91 and sustained substantial damage. The private pilot undergoing instrument training and the certified flight instructor were not injured. The airplane departed Oxnard, California, about 1600 for a local area dual instructional flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. After departure from Oxnard, basic instrument flight maneuvers were practiced. The private pilot was instructed to fly a series of headings, altitudes, and airspeeds. These vectors terminated as the airplane arrived at the Santa Paula airport. The instructor stated the pilot removed the restrictive visibility glasses on the downwind leg for runway 22. He also said the landing was good but the brakes did not seem to hold. The instructor applied brakes, but felt no right pedal pressure. He attempted to skid the airplane from the end of the runway to avoid collision with a wall, but was unsuccessful. The pilot stated he heard what he thought was rain striking the airplane after the instructor called the Santa Paula CTAF on the radio. He said that when he was told to remove the vision restrictive glasses they were on final approach for runway 22. He said their position was close to the runway and they were high and to the left of centerline. He said that if he were alone, he would have gone around for another attempt, and he verbalized this desire to the instructor. He said the instructor responded verbally that they had plenty of room to land, and the instructor then took physical control of the airplane. The pilot stated they began a descending right turn to the runway and touched down approximately halfway down the runway on centerline. He said water was on the runway, and he could tell from action on the rudder pedals that the instructor was applying brakes. There was no apparent braking and the airplane departed the runway. It continued through a muddy overrun area, back onto a taxiway, and then it contacted a block wall. The airplane was secured and subsequently pushed to a maintenance facility. Witness statements in the Santa Paula Airport Association incident record notes that the airplane landed after the halfway point of the 2,650-foot-long runway, and witnesses thought the power was not all of the way off. The narrative section also notes two skid marks were evident before and after the overrun area. The Santa Paula Police Department report notes the private pilot said he touched down on the runway and began to slow down. However, he could not come to a complete stop and turn safely prior to reaching the end of the runway. The instructor stated they possibly misjudged the amount of distance remaining and braking power. He also said they might have hit water, causing them to slide. The annual inspection record for the aircraft dated August 30, 1998, indicated four brake pads and the right main tire were replaced, 163 hours prior to the accident. After the mishap a Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the brake system. The inspector applied pressure to the brake pedals. Both pedals were firm and two men could not move the airplane.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time16:30 PST
Nearest AirportSanta Paula (0nm)
Runway22
Runway Length2650 ft
Runway Width40 ft
Flight Plan FiledNone
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftCessna 172L
Tail NumberN7639G
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · O-320-E2D · Reciprocating · 160
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (2 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured2
Total2
Crew 1Age 64 · Second Class

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind200° @ 10 kt
Visibility40 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point54 / 41 C
Altimeter29.00 inHg
Observation Time23:50
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data