Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Concord, CA
The flight instructor and student were practicing straight-in autorotations with power recoveries. During the first four autorotations, the student was the primary manipulator of the controls. The student was initiating the flare too high and so the instructor told the student that they would do the next approach together with both of them on the controls. During the flare portion of the ensuing autorotation, the stinger struck the runway surface. The tail rotor then contacted the surface and the helicopter yawed 360 degrees to the right and came to rest approximately 100 feet where the tail rotor struck the runway. The main rotor severed the tail boom. The instructor reported that he believed that the student misinterpreted his instructions to mean that he (the instructor) would be making the primary control inputs, whereas, he had intended for the student to make control inputs to initiate the flare. He planned just to follow through on the controls to guide the student to flare a little lower than on the previous attempts. The flight instructor stated that the accident could have been prevented through 'better communication between student and instructor as to who is responsible for initiating a control input during all phases of flight and especially during critical phases.'
The inadequate supervision of the student pilot by the flight instructor during the practice autorotation, which resulted in a delayed flare and the tail rotor contacting the ground. A factor was a misinterpreted communication between the flight instructor and student.
On April 30, 1999, at 0917 hours Pacific daylight time, a Schweizer 269C-1 helicopter, N6148V, impacted the ground and severed the tail boom during a practice autorotation landing at the Concord, California, airport. The helicopter, operated by Helicopter Adventures, Inc., Concord, sustained substantial damage. The commercial licensed flight instructor and student pilot were not injured. The local instructional flight was conducted under 14 CFR Part 91 and originated at the Concord airport about 0830. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The flight instructor reported that he and the student were practicing straight-in autorotations with power recoveries. During the first four autorotations, the student was the primary manipulator of the controls. The instructor reported that the student was initiating the flare too high, so he told the student that they would do the next approach together with both of them on the controls. During the flare portion of the autorotation, the stinger struck the runway surface. The tail rotor then contacted the surface and the helicopter began to yaw to the right. The instructor rolled the throttle off after about 90 degrees of right yaw and entered a hovering autorotation. The helicopter ultimately yawed 360 degrees to the right and the landing gear skids contacted the ground with the aircraft coming to rest approximately 100 feet from the point where the tail rotor struck the runway. The main rotor severed the tail boom. The flight instructor stated that he had intended for the student to initiate the flare, and he planned just to follow through on the controls to guide him to flare a little lower than on the previous attempts. He reported that he believes that the student interpreted his instructions to mean that he (the instructor) would be making the primary inputs. The flight instructor reported that the accident could have been prevented through "better communication between student and instructor as to who is responsible for initiating a control input during all phases of flight and especially during critical phases."