Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Franklin, TN
ACCORDING TO THE STUDENT PILOT, WHILE MANEUVERING, THE FLIGHT CONTROLS JAMMED AND LIMITED FLIGHT CONTROLLABILITY. A VISUAL CHECK OF THE FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM BY THE STUDENT PILOT, FROM THE COCKPIT, FAILED TO REVEAL AN AIRPLANE PROBLEM. HE ESTABLISHED AN EMERGENCY GLIDE AND ONCE THE AIRPLANE WAS OVER A CLEAR AREA THE STUDENT PILOT DEPLOYED THE ONBOARD RECOVERY PARACHUTE. THE AIRPLANE COLLIDED WITH THE GROUND IN A NOSE LOW ATTITUDE. THE PILOT REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO DEPARTURE, HE PLACED A SPARE RADIO BATTERY ON THE FLOORBOARD OF THE COCKPIT AND BELIEVED THAT THE BATTERY PACK JAMMED THE FLIGHT CONTROLS.
THE PILOT'S FAILURE TO SECURE CARGO IN THE COCKPIT.
On February 18, 1994, at 1000 central standard time, an unregistered Argo Minimax, experimental airplane, collided with the ground, after the pilot experienced a reported flight control problem, near Franklin, Tennessee. The personal flight operated under 14 CFR Part 91 with no flight plan filed. Visual weather conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The airplane sustained substantial damage, and the non-rated pilot received serious injuries. The flight departed Spring Hill, Tennessee, at 0815 hours. According to the student pilot, while maneuvering, the flight controls jammed, and the controllability of the airplane became limited. A visual check of the exposed flight control surfaces and cables failed to reveal a mechanical problem. The pilot selected a field and established an emergency descent. Once the airplane was within the landing area, the pilot deployed the recovery parachute. The airplane descended to the ground in a nose low attitude. According to the student pilot, prior to his takeoff, he placed a communication radio battery on the floor of the airplane; the pilot believed that the battery pack jammed the flight control. According to the pilot, the aircraft originally was configured for one five gallon fuel tank. He modified the airframe for the installation of two five gallons tanks, one in each wing assembly. A review of 14 CFR Part 103 disclosed that ultralight vehicles are limited to a total of five gallons of fuel capacity.