Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Gustavus, AK
THE PILOT SWITCHED FROM HIS AUXILIARY FUEL TANK TO HIS LEFT MAIN FUEL TANK WHEN THE ENGINE STOPPED PRODUCING POWER. HE HAD TO DITCH IN THE BAY. THE PILOT SAID HE THOUGHT THE ENGINE FAILED DUE TO FUEL MISMANAGEMENT.
THE PILOT-IN-COMMAND'S DELAY IN SELECTING THE MAIN FUEL TANK POSITION. THE LACK OF SUITABLE TERRAIN FOR A FORCED LANDING WAS A FACTOR.
On May 1, 1994, at 1615 Alaska daylight time, a wheel equipped Beechcraft Bonanza airplane, N441B, registered to and operated by the Pilot-in-Command, experienced a non-mechanical engine failure and was forced to ditch in the water approximately 5 miles east of Gustavus, Alaska. The personal flight, operating under 14 CFR Part 91, departed Juneau, Alaska, and the destination was Gustavus. No flight plan was filed and visual meteorological conditions prevailed. The Private certificated Pilot-in-Command and his passenger were not injured and the airplane sank in the water. According to the Pilot-in-Command, he was attempting to use up the fuel in the auxiliary fuel tanks. He stated that he felt the engine failed at the same time he switched to the left main fuel tank. The airplane came to rest between the low and high tide lines. According to Ned Horne, FAA, FSDO 05, Juneau, Alaska, the Pilot-in-Command informally admitted that the engine did not fail due to a mechanical reason but due to fuel mismanagement. The Pilot-in-Command did not submit an NTSB 6120.1/2.