Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Lubbock, TX
THE AGRICULTURAL AIRPLANE COLLIDED WITH IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WHILE APPLYING PESTICIDES TO A COTTON FIELD. AFTER THE COLLISION, THE ENGINE LOST POWER AND THE PILOT EXECUTED A FORCED LANDING. THE AIRPLANE WAS STRUCTURALLY DAMAGED DURING THE FORCED LANDING. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE WAS TIRED AND HAD DIFFICULTY SEEING THE IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WHICH 'BLENDED INTO THE WHITE COTTON THAT WAS 90% OPEN.'
THE PILOT'S FAILURE TO MAINTAIN CLEARANCE WITH THE IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. A FACTOR WAS PILOT FATIGUE.
On October 21, 1994, at 0945 central daylight time, an Air Tractor AT-301, N8523S, was substantially damaged while manuevering near Lubbock, Texas. The commercial pilot was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the aerial application flight. During an interview, the pilot reported that he was spraying cotton plant defoliant "close to the ground" in an effort to increase its effectiveness. During an application pass, the aircraft struck stationary irrigation spraying equipment with the left main landing wheel and the propeller. He stated that after the left main landing wheel made contact, the aircraft started to nose down and the propeller made contact with the wheels of the equipment. The engine then "exploded." The pilot maintained control of the aircraft and glided to a forced landing in a stripped corn field approximately 200 yards from the initial impact with the irrigation equipment. The pilot further stated that he was "tired after many days of spaying", and that the irrigation equipment was difficult to see because it "blended into the white cotton that was 90% open." Examination of the airplane at the site revealed evidence of propeller blade contact on the irrigation spraying equipment. The left main landing gear was sheared from its attachment point and the left wing was structurally damaged during the forced landing.