Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Ramona, CA
The aircraft had not flown over the past 2 years and was recently purchased by the owner. This was the first flight of the aircraft following a condition inspection to return it to service. The pilot reported that he took off following a detailed inspection of the aircraft and a prolonged ground run-up. At 200 feet over the runway's departure end, the engine sputtered and lost power. The pilot maneuvered the aircraft for a forced landing in an adjoining cattle pasture. The engine suddenly began to run at full power again, and the pilot turned the aircraft toward the runway. The engine began to surge, and the pilot then landed in the pasture. The aircraft encountered rough terrain and was damaged. The pilot said the engine symptoms led him to believe that there might have been a fuel flow problem. The aircraft was examined by FAA airworthiness inspectors who found that the fuel vent line was not routed in accordance with the aircraft plans.
an interruption of fuel flow to the engine due to a misrouted fuel vent line.
On December 27, 1995, at 1615 hours Pacific standard time, a homebuilt experimental Nicholson Sonerai II airplane, N68676, collided with the ground following a loss of power during the takeoff initial climb at Ramona, California. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time and no flight plan was filed. The aircraft incurred substantial damage. The certificated Airline Transport Pilot, the sole occupant, sustained minor injuries. The flight was originating at the time as a local area personal flight. The aircraft had not flown over the past 2 years and was recently purchased by the owner. This was the first flight of the aircraft following a condition inspection to return it to service. Review of the aircraft records discloses that the aircraft has been relatively inactive for the last 10 years, and has only flown 83 hours since 1977. The pilot reported that following a detailed inspection of the aircraft and a prolonged ground run-up, he took off on runway 27. As the aircraft achieved 200 feet over the departure end of the runway, the engine sputtered and lost power. The pilot's attempts to restore power were unsuccessful, and he set up for a forced landing in an adjoining cattle pasture. The engine suddenly began to run at full power again and the pilot turned the aircraft toward the runway. The engine began to surge and the pilot landed in the pasture. The aircraft ground looped after encountering rough terrain. In his statement, the pilot noted that the engine symptoms led him to believe that "there might have been a fuel flow problem." The aircraft was initially examined at the accident site by FAA airworthiness inspectors from the San Diego Flight Standards District Office. After recovery from the site, the inspectors performed a detailed engine, airframe, and system examination. Their report is attached. The discrepancies noted during the inspection were: 1) numbers 1, 3 and 4 spark plugs were carbon fouled and very sooty; 2) no filter cartridge in gascolator (aviation gas used in system and no contaminates were found); 3) magneto drive exhibited excessive wear and no rubber cushioning device was present; 4) ignition lead cap pickups were worn; and 5) the fuel vent was not routed in accordance with the aircraft plans.