Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

December 7, 1995 · Boeing 747-240 · APBAK

Jamaica, NY

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Incident
Date
December 7, 1995
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (255 uninjured)
Location
Jamaica, NY
Aircraft
Boeing 747-240
Tail Number
APBAK
Operator
Pakistan International Airline
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Minor
NTSB Number
NYC96IA036

After takeoff, about 1,000 ft agl, the crew of the Boeing 747-240 heard a 'thudding noise,' followed by a loss of power in the number two engine. An engine shut down was completed, and an uneventful landing was made at the departure airport. The airplane was equipped with General Electric CF6-50E2 engines. Examination revealed that the low pressure turbine module, which included a portion of the fan mid shaft (FMS) and turbine rear frame, was missing. The airplane sustained damage to the left wing leading and tailing edge flaps, the left main wing landing gear doors, and the number one engine. Examination of the number two engine revealed a fracture face on the forward end of the FMS that showed multiple fatigue origins and circumferential cracks. There were also areas on the FMS that were heat affected. The FMS had previously been installed in a CF6-50 engine that had sustained a failure of the number 3 bearing inner race. The engine had been inspected by company personnel, and records did not reflect that they inspected the FMS for heat affected material. Fatigue cracks located in the heat-affected areas were found to have Sermetel paint and debris in the cracks.

NTSB Probable Cause

failure of the number two engine fan mid shaft, due a fatigue fracture caused by a previous bearing failure, and failure of the operator's maintenance personnel to detect the cracks during subsequent inspections.

Full Narrative

On December 6, 1995, about 2150 eastern standard time, a Boeing 747-240, APBAK, operated by the Pakistan Government as Flight 722, sustained minor damage during an uncontained engine failure after takeoff from the John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK), Jamaica, New York. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the commercial passenger flight that departed, at 2148. The crew of 15, and 240 passengers, were not injured. An instrument flight rules flight plan had been filed for the flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 129. The three flight crewmembers provided similar accounts of the event. In the Flight Engineer's statement, he said that the engine start and taxi were normal, and full power was applied before the airplane reached 80 knots. At that time all of the engine parameters were equal. During the climb, about 1,000 feet, a "thudding noise" was heard on the left side of the airplane. This was followed by all of the parameters of the number two engine falling to zero, which included the oil quantity. There was no engine fire warning light. An engine shut down was completed, and the airplane was vectored by the Air Traffic Controller while they "dumped" fuel. The airplane was then flown back to JFK, and completed an uneventful landing on runway 31L, at 2311. The airplane was taxied to the gate and the passengers deplaned. An emergency evacuation was not performed. Two NTSB Powerplant Group Chairman were assigned to the accident at different times. The first Powerplant investigator conducted the on scene investigation. A second Powerplant investigator conducted the examination of the engine at the General Electric facility, Ontario, California. The airplane had been equipped with General Electric CF6-50E2 engines. Examination of the airplane revealed that the low pressure turbine (LPT) module, which included a portion of the fan mid shaft (FMS), exhaust cone, exhaust nozzle, and turbine rear frame were missing. The LPT case had separated from the turbine mid frame. The airplane sustained damage to the wing adjacent to the number two engine, the left wing leading and tailing edge flaps, and to the left main wing landing gear door. Additional damage was observed to the number one engine nacelle, fan, and engine core. The NTSB Powerplant Group Chairman's Factual report dated June 5, 1997, stated that the engine examination was conducted on January 3, 1996. The disassembly of the engine revealed that the FMS had multiple fractures between 21 and 26 inches aft of the forward end. The report also stated: "...The visual and scanning electron microscope (SEM) examination of the fracture face on the forward end of the FMS showed there were multiple fatigue origins and circumferential cracks on the outer diameter (OD) of the shaft. The air duct forward and center stiffener rings were also found to have fatigue cracks that were parallel to the centerline of the air duct...GEAE's examination of the FMS showed that there were areas on the FMS OD that were heat affected, but the Sermetel paint over those area was not rubbed. Fatigue cracks that were located in the heat-affected areas were found to have Sermetel paint and debris in the cracks. GEAE provided the Safety Board with a summary of the maintenance history of the FMS that fractured. The FMS had previously been installed in a PIA CF6-50 engine that had sustained a No. 3 bearing inner race failure. The records did not show that PIA had inspected the FMS for heat affected material that would have occurred if the FMS had been rubbed following the bearing failure or at any of the subsequent maintenance exposures."

Flight

Event TypeIncident
Event Time21:50 EST
Nearest AirportJohn F Kennedy Intl (0nm)
Runway0
Flight Plan FiledIFR
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftBoeing 747-240
Tail NumberAPBAK
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageMinor
OperatorPakistan International Airline
Operating RulePart 129
Engines4
Engine TypeTurbofan
Engine DetailsGe · CF6-50E2 · Turbofan · 50400

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (255 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured255
Total255
Crew 1Age 59 · First Class

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDark Night
Wind260° @ 7 kt
Visibility20 sm
CeilingOvercast 2500 ft
Temperature / Dew Point39 C / 18 C
Altimeter30.00 inHg
Observation Time03:50
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data