Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Austin, TX
The pilot-rated student had completed a 'normal touch-and-go on runway 36 at Austin Executive Airpark. After turning crosswind and during climb to pattern altitude, the engine started 'surging and the entire airplane was violently shaking.' The flight instructor took the controls and executed a 180 degree turn to attempt to land downwind on runway 18. The aircraft 'overshot' the runway, descended through trees, and came to a stop inverted. Examination of the engine revealed the #3 connecting rod bolts were broken, the bolt boss was broken off, and the cap was bent. The #3 connecting rod bearings were found destroyed.
the partial loss of engine power due to the failure of the #3 connecting rod. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
On February 23, 1996, about 1630 central standard time, a Cessna 172N, N6601D, operated by Canelas International Aviation as a Title 14 CFR Part 91 instructional flight, was substantially damaged during a forced landing near Austin, Texas. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a flight plan was not filed. The flight instructor and the private pilot rated student were seriously injured. The flight originated from Robert Mueller Municipal Airport, Austin, Texas, about 30 minutes before the accident. The flight instructor reported to the FAA inspector and in the Pilot/Operator Report the following information. The pilot rated student had completed a "normal touch-and-go on runway 36 at Austin Executive Airpark. After turning crosswind and during climb to pattern altitude, the engine started "surging and the entire airplane was violently shaking." The flight instructor took the controls and executed a 180 degree turn to attempt to land downwind on runway 18. The aircraft "overshot" the runway, descended through trees, and came to a stop inverted. Examination of the aircraft wreckage by the FAA inspector revealed the following. Both wing fuel tanks contained only residual fuel; however, there was evidence of fuel leakage. The left wing was separated from the fuselage, the left main landing gear was separated, the nose landing gear was folded under, and the left side of the cabin was crushed inward. One propeller blade had no damage and the other propeller blade exhibited "S" bending. The engine was examined by the NTSB at Air Salvage of Dallas on March 27 and May 2, 1996. The examination revealed that the #3 connecting rod bolts were broken, the bolt boss was broken off, and the cap was bent. The #3 connecting rod bearings were found destroyed. (See the enclosed manufacturer's teardown report) Repeated attempts to obtain a completed Pilot/Operator Report, NTSB Form 6120.1/2, from the private pilot rated student were unsuccessful.