Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

June 24, 1996 · Beech B35 · N5001C

Chesterfield, MO

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
June 24, 1996
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (2 uninjured)
Location
Chesterfield, MO
Aircraft
Beech B35
Tail Number
N5001C
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
CHI96LA235

The pilot/owner reported that he was flying at 140 mph when he encountered light turbulence, and the airplane started to shake. The shaking lasted for about three seconds before the pilot/owner could reduce power and pull back on the yoke to slow the airplane. He then continued on to his destination where he made a normal landing. After landing, extensive damage was found in the area of the aft fuselage. An investigation revealed the airplane did not have a current annual inspection. There were pinholes in the pitot tube where it had been welded. The airspeed indicator was tested, and it did not meet specifications. The ruddervators were examined for proper balance and rigging. The service balance range for the ruddervators is 16.8 to 19.8 inch-pounds trailing edge heavy (underbalance). Using the counterbalance method, the underbalance of the left and right ruddervators was determined to be 22.53 and 22.68 inch-pounds, respectively. Both the left and right ruddervator trim tab hinge pins had been installed incorrectly. The incorrectly installed trim tabs exhibited significant vertical free play near the inboard end; the tabs also had restricted up and down angular travel. The ruddervator balance and the trim tab installation had been performed by two different aircraft maintenance facilities.

NTSB Probable Cause

improperly balanced ruddervators and improperly installed ruddervator (elevator) trim tabs, due to improper maintenance, which resulted in ruddervator flutter and substantial damage in the area of the aft fuselage. Factors relating to the accident were: improper planning/decision by the owner/operator (pilot) by failing to ensure that the annual inspection and required aircraft maintenance were performed; and turbulence that led to vibration of the improperly balanced ruddervator.

Full Narrative

On June 23, 1996, at 2130 central daylight time, a Beech B-35, N5001C, sustained substantial damage when it encountered moderate turbulence during cruise near Chesterfield, Missouri. After landing, the pilot inspected the airplane and discovered structural damage to the fuselage and stabilators. The private pilot reported no injuries himself or to the one passenger. The 14 CFR Part 91 flight departed Jefferson City, Missouri, en route to Chesterfield, Missouri. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed. The pilot reported that he was flying at 2,500 feet mean sea level (MSL) at 140 MPH. He reported encountering light turbulence and that the airplane started to shake. The shaking lasted for about three seconds before he could reduce the power and pull back on the yoke. He slowed the aircraft and was able to continue on to his destination where he made a normal landing. In a separate statement to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the pilot indicated that the airspeed may have been higher than what was initially reported. The pilot reported to the FAA that the airspeed was 5 to 10 knots over the Red Line of 125 knots that was marked on the airspeed indicator. An examination of the aircraft and logbooks by an Airworthiness Inspector of the FAA revealed that the aircraft did not have a current annual inspection. An inspection of the pitot tube revealed that there were pinholes in the tube where it had been welded. The airspeed indicator was tested and it was determined that it did not meet specifications. Maintenance records and invoices indicated that the aircraft was extensively refurbished between November 1994 and May 1995. An invoice dated March 9, 1995, indicated that the trim tabs were installed on the ruddervators and were rigged and balanced. The annual inspection was signed on May 20, 1995. Included in the annual inspection sign-off was the statement, "Installed overhaul + balanced ruddervators." The aircraft logbook indicated that the aircraft was painted on August 16, 1995. The logbook entry reads: "...Ailerons, flaps, and ruddervators were removed. Repainted and reinstalled I.A.W. Manufacturers Specifications. The static balance check on the ailerons and ruddervators has been done. Aircraft approved for return to service." An inspection of the aircraft by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) revealed extensive structural damage to the empennage of the airplane. The ruddervators were examined for proper balance and rigging. The service balance range for the ruddervators was 16.8 to 19.8 inch-pounds trailing edge heavy (underbalance). Using the counterbalance method, the underbalance of the left and right ruddervators was determined to be 22.53 and 22.68 inch-pounds, respectively. The lead counterweight in the left ruddervator balance horn weighed 1.94 pounds. Some of the lead had been removed by drilling and there were no mounting screws or washers installed. The lead counterweight for the right ruddervator weighed 2.17 pounds. Six lead washers of undetermined origin were attached and weighed 0.32 pounds. Both the left and right ruddervator trim tab hinge pins had been installed incorrectly. The left hinge pin was removed and reinstalled correctly for comparison purposes. The correctly installed tab exhibited no free play and could be rotated easily up and down. By comparison, the incorrectly installed right trim tab exhibited significant vertical free play near its inboard end and restricted up and down angular travel. (See Structural Factual Report)

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time21:30 CDT
Nearest Airport0nm
Runway0
Flight Plan FiledNone
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftBeech B35
Tail NumberN5001C
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsContinental · E-225-8 · Reciprocating · 225
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (2 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured2
Total2
Crew 1Age 36 · Third Class

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightBright Night
Wind360° @ 10 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point0 C
Altimeter30.00 inHg
Weather SourcePILO

Appendix: Source Data