Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

January 18, 1997 · Piper PA-28R-200 · N57010

Thorndale, PA

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
January 18, 1997
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (2 uninjured)
Location
Thorndale, PA
Aircraft
Piper PA-28R-200
Tail Number
N57010
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
NYC97LA046

The pilot reported that during cruise flight the engine started to run rough followed by a total loss of engine power. The pilot performed a forced landing during which the airplane collided with a utility pole. Examination of the engine revealed that the crankshaft was separated in two with an additional crack. Review of the maintenance records revealed that the crankshaft was overhauled by Engine Components, Inc., San Antonio, Texas. During the first magnetic particle inspection, the crankshaft was considered for rejection due to heat cracks in the area of the number 3 main journal. The main and rod journals were then ground and renitrided. The crankshaft then had two additional magnetic particle inspections and was returned to service. Examination of the crankshaft revealed that preexisting fatigue cracks propagated at least 75 percent of the crank cheek wall. The accident occurred about 9 flight hours after the crankshaft inspections which were conducted in December, 1996.

NTSB Probable Cause

Inadequate overhaul of the crankshaft that failed to detect fatigue cracks, which resulted in a total loss of engine power when the crankshaft separated in two.

Full Narrative

On January 18, 1997, about 1145 eastern standard time, a Piper PA-28R-200, N57010, was substantially damaged when it collided with a utility pole during a forced landing, near Thorndale, Pennsylvania. The certificated airline transport pilot and private pilot were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local flight that departed the Chester County G.O. Carlson Airport, Coatesville, Pennsylvania. No flight plan was filed for the instructional flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. In a written statement submitted by the airline transport pilot, a certificated flight instructor, he stated the following: "This started as a high performance checkout. After some stalls and slow flight and VOR tracking, engine started to run rough. Switched [fuel] tanks, alternate air and check and switched magnetos. Pointed airplane toward [Coatesville] upon which the engine seized. . . ." On February 25, 1997, the engine was examined at the manufacturer, Textron Lycoming, Williamsport, Pennsylvania under the supervision of the NTSB investigator. The engine model was an IO-360-C1C. During the examination, the engine was unable to be rotated by hand. The engine was then disassembled for further examination. During the disassembly, it was revealed that the crankshaft was separated in two just aft of the number 2 cylinder connecting rod. Another crack was observed just forward of the number 1 cylinder connecting rod. On April 18, 1997, the crankshaft was examined at the NTSB office of research and engineering material laboratory division, Washington, District of Columbia. The following are excerpts from the metallurgist's factual report: "This crankshaft separated through the number 3 crank cheek intersecting the forward radius of the number 3 main journal and the aft radius of the number 2 rod journal. . . .Stereo microscope examination of [the aft] fracture revealed ratchet marks indicative of multiple fracture origins that emanated from the surface of the forward radius of the number 3 main journal. . . .Clam shell marks typical of a fatigue crack progressed away from the ratchet marks. . . .This fatigue crack propagated at least 75% of the crank cheek wall. The area outside the fatigue region contained features typical of overstress separation as well as isolated areas with mechanical damage." "In December 11, 1996, the crankshaft was overhauled by Engine Components, Inc. (ECI), San Antonio, Texas. According to the travel card for this overhaul, an initial magnetic particle inspection method found heat cracking [in] the front fillet radius of the number 3 main journal and there was a remark entered indicating possibility for rejection. The main and rod journals were then ground 0.010 inch undersize and renitrided. During the NTSB metallurgical examination a representative from ECI was contacted by phone to clarify additional information made on the work card. This representative indicated that the crankshaft passed 2 additional magnetic particle inspections on December 3, 1996 after the grinding process and on December 11, 1996 after the renitride process. The engine log book indicated that at about the same time period as the crankshaft overhaul, ECI repaired excessive fretting damage in the middle main bearing saddle of the crankcase." According to the NTSB form 6120.1/2, the airplane had accumulated about 9 hours of flight time since the overhaul of the crankshaft.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time11:45 EST
Nearest Airport0nm
Runway0
Flight Plan FiledNone
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftPiper PA-28R-200
Tail NumberN57010
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · IO-360-C1C · Reciprocating · 200
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (2 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured2
Total2
Crew 1Age 61 · Second Class

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind290° @ 18 kt
Visibility30 sm
CeilingBroken clouds 20000 ft
Temperature / Dew Point14 C / 10 C
Altimeter29.00 inHg
Observation Time16:50
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data