Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Palo Alto, CA
The pilot, who was the owner/operator of the airplane, applied engine power for takeoff, and the airplane accelerated and climbed approximately 50 feet above the runway. Suddenly, the airplane banked right, and the pilot attempted to lower the left wing by applying opposite aileron. His efforts were inadequate. He lost control of the airplane as the nose pitched down, and the airplane crashed. The airplane came to rest in an open dirt field about 150 feet from the runway's edge. The pilot reported that no mechanical malfunction or failures were experienced during the flight. An examination of the airplane revealed it had been modified by the addition of fuel tanks which increased the total fuel tank capacity from 25 gallons (standard) to about 60 gallons. The pilot reported that this modification, which was performed under his direction, had increased the airplane's stall speed by 6 mph. The FAA had not approved the modification.
the pilot's failure to obtain and/or maintain adequate airspeed during initial climb after takeoff, which resulted in an inadvertent stall and collision with the terrain. A factor relating to the accident was: the degraded climb performance due to an unauthorized modification of the airplane, which increased the airplane's maximum fuel tank capacity and stall speed.
On April 30, 1997, at 1620 hours Pacific daylight time, a Cessna 140, N2031N, owned and operated by the pilot, crashed during an attempted takeoff from runway 30 at the Palo Alto Airport of Santa Clara County, Palo Alto, California. The airplane was destroyed, and the commercial pilot received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed during the personal flight, and no flight plan was filed. The flight was originating at the time of the accident. According to the pilot, he applied engine power and the airplane accelerated normally. Upon reaching an altitude approximately 50 feet above the runway, the airplane suddenly banked right. The pilot attempted to lower the left wing by applying opposite aileron. He stated that his efforts were not adequate, and he lost control of the airplane as the nose pitched down. The airplane's right wing and engine then contacted the ground. The engine separated from the airframe, and the propeller separated from the engine. The airplane came to rest in an upright attitude in an open dirt field about 150 feet from the runway's edge. The pilot reported that no mechanical malfunction or failures were experienced during the flight. The Federal Aviation Administration coordinator (FAA) examined the airplane wreckage. According to the FAA, the airplane's fuel system had been modified by the addition of outboard wing fuel tanks. The airplane's total fuel tank capacity had been increased from the standard 25 gallons to about 60 gallons. The pilot reported having about 55 gallons of fuel onboard during the attempted takeoff. This added capacity raised the airplane's gross weight, and the stall speed increased by 6 miles per hour. The pilot additionally reported to the FAA that the airframe modification had been performed under his direction. No logbook maintenance entries were found relating to the work. The FAA reported that it had not approved the modification.