Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

March 26, 1998 · Cessna 150G · N2952J

Sonoma, CA

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
March 26, 1998
Injury Outcomes
2 injuries (1 serious injury, 1 minor injury)
Location
Sonoma, CA
Aircraft
Cessna 150G
Tail Number
N2952J
Injuries
Serious
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
LAX98LA125

The instructor pilot and student pilot were preparing for the student pilot's private pilot check ride. Both pilots remember practicing maneuvers for 40 minutes before returning to the airport to practice soft and short field takeoffs and landings. On the landing preceding the accident takeoff, the instructor simulated an engine failure and the student landed without any difficulty. On the accident takeoff, the student pilot raised the flaps and the instructor simultaneously leaned the mixture to simulate a power loss. The instructor took over the controls when the student did not recognize the situation. He attempted a restart of the engine, while the student flew the aircraft to an open field. While attempting to restart the engine, the instructor observed a power line and instructed the student to fly underneath the power line. Both pilots stated that on the last attempt to restart the engine, it started. They both looked up and saw power lines and attempted to maneuver the aircraft underneath the power lines. The student pilot stated that his instructor did not indicate to him that he was going to simulate an engine failure.

NTSB Probable Cause

The instructor pilot's inadequate in-flight planning/decision and subsequent inadequate supervision of the situation to simulate an engine failure on takeoff, as well as both pilot's not maintaining a visual lookout. A related factor was the diverted attention of both the instructor and student pilot's.

Full Narrative

On March 25, 1998, at 1615 hours Pacific standard time a Cessna 150G, N2952J, lost engine power after takeoff, struck power lines, and came to rest inverted in the back yard of a residence near the Sonoma Sky Park, Sonoma, California. The aircraft sustained substantial damage. The commercial rated flight instructor pilot/owner received serious injuries, and the student pilot received minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions existed for the local instructional flight and no flight plan was filed. The student pilot reported that he was preparing for his private pilot check ride and had asked his flight instructor to practice flight maneuvers with him. The student pilot reported that they flew for approximately 40 minutes and returned to the airport to practice soft and short field takeoff's and landings. On the landing preceding the accident takeoff the instructor simulated an engine failure and the student landed without incident. The student pilot stated that they taxied back to runway 26 for a soft field takeoff. Approximately 200 feet above ground level (agl) the student raised the flaps. He reported that at this time the instructor leaned the mixture. The engine stopped and both pilot's attempted to restart the engine. The student pilot stated that on the last attempt the engine "caught" and they both looked up and saw power lines and attempted to maneuver the aircraft underneath the power lines. The student pilot reported feeling a big jerk and then a tumbling sensation. In a telephone interview, the student pilot reported that a couple of days after the accident he had an opportunity to speak to the instructor. The instructor informed him that the reason he had leaned the mixture was to simulate an engine failure on takeoff. The student pilot stated that his instructor did not indicate to him that he was going to simulate an engine failure. In the instructor's written statement to the Safety Board he reported that at approximately 400 feet agl he initiated a simulated emergency. He stated that when the student did not lower the nose he took over the controls, lowered the nose and enriched the mixture. The instructor pilot reported that the engine was "slowly wind milling and did not restart." He attempted a restart of the engine, while the student flew the aircraft to an open field. The instructor reported that after repeated attempts to restart the engine, he observed a power line in their flight path and instructed the student to fly underneath it. The instructor stated that they did not see the telephone and cable lines underneath the power lines until it was too late. The instructor believed that the engine restarted at the same time they impacted the telephone and cable lines. An officer from the Sonoma County Sheriff's Department reported that a steel cable was wrapped around the propeller. This was verified by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector from the Oakland, California, Flight Standards District Office who examined the aircraft on-scene The FAA inspector could not establish control continuity due to the aircraft being inverted. He did note that the belly of the aircraft was covered in oil to the tail cone and there was no evidence of a fuel spill.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time16:15 PST
Nearest AirportSonoma Sky Park (1nm W)
Runway26
Runway Length2480 ft
Runway Width40 ft
Flight Plan FiledNone
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftCessna 150G
Tail NumberN2952J
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsContinental · O-200-A · Reciprocating
Seats2

People & Injuries

Injury Summary2 injuries (1 serious injury, 1 minor injury)
Fatal0
Serious1
Minor1
Uninjured0
Total2
Crew 1Age 57 · Second Class

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind6 kt
Visibility20 sm
CeilingBroken clouds 8000 ft
Temperature / Dew Point50 / 48
Altimeter29.00 inHg
Observation Time23:45
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data