Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Whitefield, NH
During an instruction flight, the flight instructor (CFI) was given a clearance to execute the localizer runway 10 approach to the Mount Washington Regional Airport. The airport's runway measures 3,495 feet in length and the CFI intended to make a 'full stop' landing. The CFI estimated approximately a quarter of an inch of standing water, with surface winds of 300 degrees at 15 knots gusting to 20 knots. Because of the landing environment, the CFI decided to land the airplane herself, feeling that it might be too difficult for her student. In addition, she maintained 90 mph on final because of the wind gusts. According to the CFI, the airplane touched down on centerline, approximately 1/2 of the way down the runway, and that the brakes had no effect, and directional control was marginal. The airplane then departed the runway.
The instructor pilot's failure to maintain control of the aircraft during landing roll. Contributing factors were the instructor pilot's improper in-flight decision, tailwind and gusty conditions, and wet (standing water) runway conditions.
On July 20, 1998, at 1615 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-28-161, N8182A, was substantially damage when it departed the left side of a wet runway while landing at Mount Washington Regional Airport (HIE), Whitefield, New Hampshire. The certificated flight instructor (CFI), and student pilot were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the instructional flight that originated from Manchester Airport (MHT), Manchester, New Hampshire. An instrument flight rules flight plan had been filed for the flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The CFI stated that she checked the brakes while taxiing for departure from MHT. After departing, the pilot was assigned an initial altitude of 3,000 feet above mean sea level (MSL), and to avoid clouds building en route, she requested a higher altitude, and was subsequently cleared to 8,000 feet MSL. According to the CFI, they where cleared for the Localizer 10 approach to HIE, with the intent of performing a full stop landing. The CFI stated that while on the approach, they descended below the clouds, about 3,500 feet MSL, and had 7 to 8 miles of visibility. The CFI estimated that on the runway was approximately a 1/4 inch of standing water, with surface winds of 300 degrees at 15 knots gusting to 20 knots. Because of the landing environment, the CFI decided to land the airplane herself, feeling that it might be too difficult for her student. In addition, she maintained 90 mph on final because of the wind gusts. The CFI stated that the airplane touchdown on the runway centerline, approximately 1/3 of the way down the runway. She added that when she applied the brakes, they had no effect, and that directional control was marginal. The airplane then departed the left side of the runway. In a written statement the CFI contributed the accident to hydroplaning.