Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Detroit Lakes, MN
As the airplane neared its destination the pilot did a pre- landing checklist. When he placed the mixture to full 'RICH' the engine began to run rough. He said the application of carburetor heat did not eliminate the roughness. The pilot said he positioned the fuel selector to the 'RIGHT' fuel tank and the engine began to run normally for a short time and then quit. The on-scene examination revealed no usable fuel in the airplane's fuel tanks. The pilot said he had told another pilot to fill the fuel tanks to the filler neck the day before the accident flight. During his preflight inspection of the airplane, the pilot said he did not visually check the fuel level, but relied on the fuel tank guages to confirm that the tanks were 'FULL.'
An inadequate preflight inspection by the pilot which resulted in fuel exhaustion and subsequent loss of engine power.
On September 2, 1998, at 1050 central daylight time (cdt), a Cessna 172N, N6703E, piloted by a commercial pilot, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a total loss of power during cruise flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The 14 CFR Part 91 Civil Air Patrol aerial observation flight was not operating on a flight plan. The pilot and passenger reported no injuries. The flight departed Hutchinson, Minnesota, at 0740 cdt. According to the pilot's written statement, the pilot said he was preparing to land at an airport and was doing the landing checklist. He said the engine began running "...very rough..." when he pushed the mixture control in. The pilot said he immediately applied the carburetor heat "...but the engine continued to run rough." He said he switched the fuel tank selector to the wing's "RIGHT" fuel tank. "[The] engine smoothed out momentarily and quit." The pilot said he made a forced landing in an alfalfa field that had about a 15-degree downslope incline. The pilot said the right wing had about "...1-quart of fuel in the right tank." He said he didn't look in the left tank but could hear "...fuel sloshing around..." in the tank when he rocked the wings. Before departing on the accident flight, the pilot said another pilot had filled the fuel tanks. The accident pilot said he told the other pilot to fuel the accident airplanes fuel tanks to "...the filler neck and watched as he did." The airplane did not fly after it had been refueled until the accident flight. During the accident flight's preflight inspection the pilot said he did not visually check the fuel tanks. He made sure the fuel caps were on tight and noted that both fuel tank gauges showed "FULL." The Federal Aviation Administration Principal Maintenance Inspector (PMI) said he did not observe fuel in N6703E's fuel tanks.