Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Jerome, ID
THE PILOT WAS BURNING FUEL FROM THE MAIN TANKS WHEN THE REAR ENGINE QUIT DUE TO FUEL STARVATION. HE WAS ABLE TO RESTART THE ENGINE, BUT SOON THEREAFTER, THE FRONT ENGINE QUIT DUE TO FUEL STARVATION, AND HE WAS UNABLE TO GET THIS ENGINE RESTARTED. ABOUT ONE MINUTE LATER, THE REAR ENGINE QUIT AGAIN, AND THE PILOT WAS NOT ABLE TO GET THE REAR ENGINE STARTED A SECOND TIME. HE THEN SELECTED THE AUXILIARY FUEL TANKS, WHICH STILL HAD FUEL IN THEM, BUT SINCE THERE IS NO AUXILIARY FUEL PUMP IN THE AUXILIARY FUEL TANK SYSTEM, HE WAS UNABLE TO GET THE ENGINES RESTARTED IN TIME TO AVOID A FORCED LANDING.
THE PILOT'S IMPROPER FUEL MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES WHICH RESULTED IN FUEL STARVATION. FACTORS INCLUDE THE PILOT'S LACK OF FAMILIARITY WITH THIS TYPE AIRCRAFT, AND ROUGH/UNEVEN TERRAIN IN THE LANDING AREA.
On July 24, 1993, at approximately 1125 mountain daylight time (MDT), a Cessna 337, N2269X, experienced a nose gear collapse during an attempted forced landing near Jerome, Idaho. The FAA certificated private pilot received serious injuries, his passenger received minor injuries, and the aircraft sustained substantial damage. The personal pleasure flight, which departed Pocatello Municipal Airport, Pocatello, Idaho about one hour earlier, was operating in visual meteorological conditions at the time of the accident. The aircraft was not on a filed flight plan, and the ELT, which was activated by the impact, was turned off at the scene. The pilot, who was not rated for multi-engine operations, and who was flying an unregistered, out-of-annual twin engine aircraft, said that he was cruising at about 1,500 feet AGL when the rear engine quit. He was able to get it restarted, but soon thereafter the front engine quit, and he was not able to get that engine restarted. Then about one minute after the front engine quit, the rear engine quit again. This time, the pilot was unable to get the rear engine restarted. He then switched to the auxiliary fuel tanks, but still could not get the engines restarted in time to avoid a forced landing. He touched down in a cultivated field, and the nose gear collapsed during the landing roll. According to the FAA Inspector who responded to the accident, both main fuel tanks were found to be empty. He said that about seven gallons of fuel were found in the right auxiliary tank, and the severed fuel line from the left auxiliary tank was observed to leak fuel for about an hour after the accident. Although the pilot said that the main tank fuel gauges read about half-full at takeoff, there was no evidence of any en route fuel leakage or malfunction in the fuel system. During the investigation it was noted that for all engine restarts in flight, the aircraft operating manual calls for the fuel selector valve to be in the Main Tank position, and for the auxiliary fuel pump to be in the "HI" position. In a telephone discussion with an investigator from Cessna Aircraft Corporation, he stated that since there are no auxiliary fuel pumps between the auxiliary fuel tanks and the engines, it is questionable whether the engines will restart once the auxiliary tanks are selected.