Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Las Vegas, NV
While climbing through 35,000 ft for a cruise altitude of 37,000 ft, the crew heard a loud 'thump' and the aircraft depressurized. As the crew descended to 11,000 ft, the cabin altitude climbed to 30,000 ft. The flight diverted to a nearby airport and safely landed. Examination of the aircraft disclosed that repetitive pressurization cycles caused the initiation of a fatigue crack and the resultant rupture of a forward pressure bulkhead. Over 14 years earlier, Douglas issued service bulletins advising operators that leaks could occur in the forward pressure bulkhead area because of metal fatigue. Douglas recommended that specific corrective action be taken which involved inspecting the area at 1,500 hour intervals or making permanent structural airframe modifications. Contrary to the majority of aircraft operators, United chose not to structurally modify this aircraft. Rather, it chose to perform recurring visual inspections for leaks in the suspect area. The aircraft's pressure bulkhead ruptured 1,367 hours after its last inspection.
RUPTURE OF A FORWARD PRESSURE BULKHEAD BECAUSE OF CYCLICALLY INDUCED METAL FATIGUE. FACTORS WHICH CONTRIBUTED TO THE INCIDENT WERE: THE OPERATOR'S DECISION NOT TO STRUCTURALLY MODIFY ITS AIRPLANE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S BUT RATHER TO RELY ON THE MANUFACTURER'S ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION OF PERFORMING REPETITIVE VISUAL INSPECTION IN THE SUSPECT AREA: AND THE OPERATOR'S FAILURE TO UTILIZE AN INSPECTION PROGRAM ADEQUATE TO VISUALLY DETECT CRACK DEVELOPMENT IN A PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED SUSPECT AREA.
WHILE CLIMBING THRU 35,000 FT FOR A CRUISE ALTITUDE OF 37,000 FT, THE CREW HEARD A LOUD 'THUMP' & THE ACFT DEPRESSURIZED. AS THE CREW DESCENDED TO 11,000 FT, THE CABIN ALTITUDE CLIMBED TO 30,000 FT. THE FLT DIVERTED TO A NEARBY ARPT & SAFELY LANDED. EXAM OF THE ACFT DISCLOSED THAT REPETITIVE PRESSURIZATION CYCLES CAUSED THE INITIATION OF A FATIGUE CRACK & THE RESULTANT RUPTURE OF A FORWARD PRESSURE BULKHEAD. OVER 14 YRS EARLIER, DOUGLAS ISSUED SERVICE BULLETINS ADVISING OPERATORS THAT LEAKS COULD OCCUR IN THE FWD PRESSURE BULKHEAD AREA BECAUSE OF METAL FATIGUE. DOUGLAS RECOMMENDED THAT SPECIFIC CORRECTIVE ACTION BE TAKEN WHICH INVOLVED INSPECTING THE AREA AT 1,500 HOUR INTERVALS OR MAKING PERMANENT STRUCTURAL AIRFRAME MODIFICATIONS. CONTRARY TO THE MAJORITY OF ACFT OPERATORS, UNITED CHOSE NOT TO STRUCTURALLY MODIFY THIS ACFT. RATHER, IT CHOSE TO PERFORM RECURRING VISUAL INSPECTIONS FOR LEAKS IN THE SUSPECT AREA. THE ACFT'S PRESSURE BULKHEAD RUPTURED 1,367 HRS AFTER IT LAST INSPECTION.