Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Lakeville, MN
THE PILOT OF A HIGH WING, SINGLE ENGINE AIRPLANE WAS FLYING A PUBLISHED ILS APPROACH AS GUIDANCE TO A RUNWAY HE INTENDED TO LAND ON. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE ANNOUNCED HIS POSITION THREE TIMES DURING THE APPROACH. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE HEARD THE PILOT OF ANOTHER AIRPLANE ANNOUNCE HIS POSITION ON BASE LEG FOR THE SAME RUNWAY HE WAS INTENDING TO LAND ON. HE STATED THAT HE COULD NOT SEE THE OTHER AIRPLANE AND DID NOT ASK THE PILOT OF THAT AIRPLANE TO RE-STATE HIS POSITION. HE CONTINUED INBOUND AND, DURING THE FLARE FOR LANDING, A LOW WING AIRPLANE LANDED ON TOP OF HIS AIRPLANE. AN ON-SCENE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT BOTH AIRPLANES WERE WHITE IN OVERALL COLOR WITH DARK TRIM. THE TERRAIN BOTH AIRPLANES WERE OPERATING OVER WAS SNOW COVERED.
THE FACT THAT BOTH PILOTS DID NOT MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION FROM EACH OTHER. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO THIS ACCIDENT WERE AN INADEQUATE VISUAL LOOKOUT FOR BOTH PILOTS AND THE PILOT IN COMMAND OF THE OTHER AIRPLANE WAS NOT FOLLOWING PROCEDURES AND DIRECTIVES.
THE PILOT OF A HIGH WING, SINGLE ENGINE AIRPLANE WAS FLYING A PUBLISHED ILS APPROACH AS GUIDANCE TO A RUNWAY HE INTENDED TO LAND ON. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE ANNOUNCED HIS POSITION THREE TIMES DURING THE APPROACH. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE HEARD THE PILOT OF ANOTHER AIRPLANE ANNOUNCE HIS POSITION ON BASE LEG FOR THE SAME RUNWAY HE WAS INTENDING TO LAND ON. HE STATED THAT HE COULD NOT SEE THE OTHER AIRPLANE AND DID NOT ASK THE PILOT OF THAT AIRPLANE TO RE-STATE HIS POSITION. HE CONTINUED INBOUND AND, DURING THE FLARE FOR LANDING, A LOW WING AIRPLANE LANDED ON TOP OF HIS AIRPLANE. AN ON-SCENE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT BOTH AIRPLANES WERE WHITE IN OVERALL COLOR WITH DARK TRIM. THE TERRAIN BOTH AIRPLANES WERE OPERATING OVER WAS SNOW COVERED.