Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

September 26, 1999 · Piper PA-28-180 · N9395J

Vaughn, WA

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
September 26, 1999
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (4 uninjured)
Location
Vaughn, WA
Aircraft
Piper PA-28-180
Tail Number
N9395J
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
SEA99LA174

While in cruise at 2,000 feet altitude and 2,000 RPM there was a sudden loud noise and vibration. The pilot reduced power and executed an emergency landing. Post-landing examination of the aircraft revealed that approximately six inches of one propeller blade had separated from the propeller. The Sensenich Corporation, fixed pitch, aluminum propeller, model 76EM8S5-0-60, was submitted to the Safety Board's Materials Laboratory, Washington, DC, for further metallurgical examination. The examination revealed a flat, chordwise fracture area that contained crack arrest positions and radial marks typical of fatigue cracking. Microscopy revealed that the origin area was located within a notch at the leading edge at the flat side of the blade. The depth of the notch was about 0.008 inch. The leading edge of the blade contained sanding marks, typical of a blend repair, in the vicinity of the notch. The sanding marks did not extend into the deepest part of the notch, directly adjacent to the fracture surface at the origin area. FAA Advisory Circular 43.13-1A, Section 3 'Repair of Metal propellers,' paragraph 585(a) discusses procedures applied to the repair of aluminum propellers. Specifically, this reference addresses rounding out of nicks, scars, cuts, etc. by advising '...exercise care to remove the deepest point of the injury.' The total time on the propeller was unavailable and the party who executed the propeller dressing procedure was not known.

NTSB Probable Cause

The separation of a propeller blade tip due to fatigue, and the improper maintenance procedure.

Full Narrative

On September 26, 1999, approximately 1430 Pacific daylight time, a Piper PA-28-180, N9395J, registered to and being flown by a private pilot, sustained substantial damage when a six-inch section of outboard propeller tip separated during cruise flight near Vaughn, Washington. The pilot and three passengers were uninjured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan had been filed. The flight, which was personal, was to have been operated under 14CFR91, and originated from the Bremerton National airport, Bremerton, Washington, approximately 1400. The pilot reported that while in cruise at 2,000 feet altitude and 2,000 RPM there was a sudden loud noise and vibration. He reduced power and executed an emergency landing to a private airstrip nearby. Post-landing examination of the aircraft revealed that approximately six inches of one propeller blade had separated from the fixed-pitch propeller (refer to photographs 1 and 2). The propeller, manufactured by Sensenich Corporation, was a model 76EM8S5-0-60, fixed pitch, aluminum unit (serial number 25629K). The total time on the propeller was unknown. The owner, however, reported that this propeller had been on this aircraft when he bought the plane about six years previously. The missing tip was not recovered, however, the remainder of the propeller was shipped to the Safety Board's Materials Laboratory, Washington, DC, for further metallurgical examination. The examination revealed a flat, chordwise fracture area that contained crack arrest positions and radial marks typical of fatigue cracking. A portion of the blade, containing the fracture surface, was cut from the remainder of the blade and examined more closely. The fracture features within the fatigue region emanated from an origin area at the leading edge of the blade and adjacent to the fracture surface. The portion showing fatigue cracking features was about 75% of the overall separation surface face. The remaining portion of the fracture surface showed inclined planes, typical of overstress. Bench binocular microscopy revealed that the origin area was located within a notch at the leading edge at the flat side of the blade. The depth of the notch was about 0.008 inch. The leading edge of the blade contained sanding marks, typical of a blend repair, in the vicinity of the notch. The sanding marks did not extend into the deepest part of the notch, directly adjacent to the fracture surface at the origin area. After cleaning, the fracture surface was examined by means of a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Examination of the fracture surface under high magnification revealed striations typical of fatigue. X-ray energy disperse spectroscopy (EDS) of the blade material generated a large peak for aluminum and smaller peaks for copper, silicon and manganese, which were consistent with the specified 2025-T6 aluminum alloy (refer to attached metallurgical report). FAA Advisory Circular 43.13-1A, Section 3 "Repair of Metal propellers," paragraph 585(a) discusses procedures applied to the repair of aluminum propellers. Specifically, this reference addresses rounding out of nicks, scars, cuts, etc. by advising to "...exercise care to remove the deepest point of the injury..." (refer to ATTACHMENT FAA AC 43.13). The propeller and sectioned fracture surface were returned to the owner.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time14:30 PDT
Nearest Airport0nm
Runway0
Flight Plan FiledNone
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftPiper PA-28-180
Tail NumberN9395J
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · O-360-A3A · Reciprocating · 180
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (4 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured4
Total4
Crew 1Age 47 · Third Class

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind230° @ 4 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point61 F / 39 C
Altimeter30.00 inHg
Observation Time21:53
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data