Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Erie, CO
During a dual instructional flight, the student pilot was practicing touch-and-go landings. The flight instructor gave him a practice engine out approach to landing. During final approach, a high sink rate occurred and the aircraft landed hard, bounced, and came to rest in a ditch beside the runway. Both wings, all the landing gear, and the propeller suffered damage. The student pilot had 27 hours total experience and the flight instructor had 56 hours in make and model, but no experience in make and model in the preceding 90 days. The accident occurred during daylight hours and the weather was winds from the north at 3 knots, clear skies, and a density altitude of 8,200 feet. The landings were being performed to runway 15.
Inadequate supervision by the certified flight instructor. Factors were loss of control by the student pilot, the flight instructor's failure to properly monitor the student pilot's rate of descent on final approach, and the flight instructor's lack of recent experience in make and model.
On September 28, 2000, at 1850 mountain daylight time, a Grumman American AA-1B, N9622L, sustained substantial damage when the aircraft was landed hard and exited the side of the runway on a dual piloted instructional flight. The flight instructor and student pilot were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for this local area flight being operated under Title 14 CFR Part 91 and no flight plan was filed. The flight departed at 1730. According to the student pilot, he had made six touch and go landings and was practicing an engine out landing to runway 15. The aircraft developed a high sink rate on short final and he said, "I landed hard and the aircraft bounced and came to rest in a ditch beside the runway." Weather at the time was daylight conditions, clear skies, wind from the north at 3 knots and a density altitude of 8,200 feet. The flight instructor had 56 hours flight experience in the accident aircraft make and model and no time in make and model in the preceding 90 days. The student pilot had 27 hours total flight experience and 15 hours in make and model, all within the preceding 30 days. All the landing gear, the propeller, and both wings sustained damage.