Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

July 6, 2001 · Garro Sonerai II · N79TG

Cortland, OH

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
July 6, 2001
Injury Outcomes
1 injury (1 minor injury)
Location
Cortland, OH
Aircraft
Garro Sonerai II
Tail Number
N79TG
Injuries
Minor
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
IAD01LA077

The pilot prepared for his first flight in the airplane by making several taxi runs up and down the runway. On take-off, the airplane became airborne half-way down the 2,700 foot long turf runway, but would not accelerate. The pilot did not look at the airspeed indicator when the airplane rotated off the runway. However, once airborne he reported that the airspeed indicator read about 60 knots, and that the manufacturer's recommended speed on climb-out was 75 knots. The pilot felt that he would not clear the 60 foot trees located off the end of the runway, and elected to abort the take-off. A videotape of the accident revealed that on take-off, when the airplane became airborne it flew just above the runway surface. It then bounced once on the main wheels, pitched up and began to climb. The airplane obtained a height of about 10-15 feet above the ground before it descended and landed off to the right side of the runway. Once on the ground, the airplane maneuvered back onto the runway. However, the airplane again went off the right side of the runway into an area of high grass, collided with a tree stump and nosed over. The pilot reported that the winds were calm and there were no mechanical deficiencies.

NTSB Probable Cause

the pilot's failure to maintain directional control during an aborted take-off. A factor was the pilot's failure to obtain adequate take-off speed.

Full Narrative

On July 6, 2001, at 1940 eastern daylight time, a homebuilt Sonerai II, N79TG, was substantially damaged during an aborted take-off from Allen Airport (8OI3), Cortland, Ohio. The certificated airline transport pilot sustained minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the local personal flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The pilot purchased the airplane from a private owner, and had it stored at his residence for 2 1/2 years. This was his first flight in the airplane. In a written statement, he said: "Last Thursday we took the airplane to the airfield for my initial flight. On Friday we felt the plane was ready so I started the plane out onto the runway. I drove down the runway a few times to get the feel for the plane. I decided to try to take off. As I got about 15 feet up, the plane lost its climb rate. I felt I was not going to be able to clear the tree line at the end of the runway, so I decided to try and land into the brush. As I entered the brush the wing hit a stump and flipped the plane over." In a telephone conversation, the pilot stated that he taxied to the end of the west runway. At the end, he turned the airplane 180 degrees around and simultaneously applied power to overcome the uphill slope, and began the take-off roll. Halfway down the runway, the tail wheel came off the ground and the airplane became airborne. The pilot said he did not look at the airspeed indicator when the airplane rotated off the runway. Once airborne, the airplane would not accelerate, and the pilot stated that the airspeed indicator read 60 knots. He reported that the manufacturer's recommended airspeed was 75 knots on climb-out. The pilot felt that he would not clear the trees, and elected to abort the take-off. An Ohio State Highway Patrol officer asked the pilot why the airplane lost the climb rate. The pilot responded: "I think it needs a longer runway or a paved runway so more speed can be gained for take-off." The pilot's brother was at the airfield and observed the airplane take-off. In a written statement, he said: "I was standing on the field observing the plane take-off westbound. He seemed to have difficulty climbing and tried to land the plane. While trying to land, he came down too fast and lost control, which caused him to turn to the right. He struck some high grass, which caused the plane to flip." The pilot's brother also videotaped the airplane's take-off. Review of the videotape revealed that the airplane back-taxied to the end of the runway, and turned around 180 degrees in preparation for take-off. Shortly after, the propeller speed appeared to increase, and the airplane began its take-off roll. When the airplane became airborne, it flew just above the runway surface. The airplane then bounced on the main wheels, pitched up and began to climb. The airplane got about 10-15 feet above the ground, before it descended and landed off the right side of the runway. The airplane negotiated through a section of high grass, before it maneuvered back onto the runway. The airplane then went out of view and the tape stopped. However, after rescue personnel arrived, the pilot's brother began taping the recovery. This portion of the tape revealed that the airplane came to rest inverted in an area of high grass off to the right side of the runway. The turf runway was 2,700 feet long, 120 feet wide, and aligned east and west. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector examined the airplane on July 9, 2001. According to the inspector, the fuselage exhibited gashes on the bottom and sides of the cockpit, both main gears were buckled and twisted, and the right wing tip and leading edge had holes through the skin. The wooden propeller was also found severed. The pilot reported a total of 2,456 flight hours, and no flight time in make and model. He also reported that there were no mechanical deficiencies.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time19:40 EDT
Nearest AirportAllen Airport (0nm)
Runway27
Runway Length2700 ft
Runway Width120 ft
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftGarro Sonerai II
Tail NumberN79TG
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsVolkswagen · 1700CC · Reciprocating · 60
Seats2

People & Injuries

Injury Summary1 injury (1 minor injury)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor1
Uninjured0
Total1
Crew 1Age 62 · Third Class · Minor

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind330° @ 4 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point45 C
Altimeter30.11 inHg
Observation Time23:51
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data