Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

September 5, 2001 · Cessna 172RG · N44EF

Carbonado, WA

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
September 5, 2001
Injury Outcomes
2 injuries (2 minor injuries)
Location
Carbonado, WA
Aircraft
Cessna 172RG
Tail Number
N44EF
Injuries
Minor
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
SEA01LA168

The pilot and passenger departed on a fire patrol flight in the Cessna 172RG. The pilot demonstrated basic flight techniques to the passenger and the aircraft proceeded into mountainous terrain. While flying southeast up a canyon the aircraft's engine performance began deteriorating. The pilot reported that about 10-15 seconds transpired between the time he initially noted the decrease in performance, to when the engine began to "cough," and that the aircraft was approximately 1,000 feet above the ground and 200 feet horizontally from the rising terrain. The aircraft impacted trees and terrain along the canyon's axis about 2,500 feet above sea level. Although the average gradient from the crash site along the aircraft's direction of flight was more than +11 degrees over the 12,000 foot distance beyond the site, the aircraft had sufficient lateral distance to execute a 180 degree turn under normal power. The pilot reported that he did not have time to exercise the carburetor heat when he began to troubleshoot. He also reported that he had not encountered carburetor icing previously. An examination of the aircraft at the accident site revealed the carburetor heat control in the "OFF" position. Moderate carburetor icing conditions existed based on temperature/dew point extrapolation from a nearby weather reporting source, and the pilot reported a ragged overcast with bases at 4,000-5,000 feet and rain showers along the route of flight. A post crash test run of the aircraft's engine was successful, however, the left magneto was found to be inoperative. It could not be determined whether the magneto became inoperative during the flight or as a consequence of the impact.

NTSB Probable Cause

The pilot-in-command's failure to utilize carburetor heat resulting in a loss of power and consequent descent into trees and terrain. Contributing factors were carburetor icing conditions and mountainous/hilly terrain.

Full Narrative

On September 5, 2001, approximately 1530 Pacific daylight time a Cessna 172RG, N44EF, registered to and being operated by Aeroflight Executive Services, Inc., and being flown by a commercially rated flight instructor, was substantially damaged during an in-flight collision with trees and terrain while maneuvering approximately five nautical miles east of Carbonado, Washington. The pilot and passenger sustained minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan had been filed. The flight was an aerial fire survey and was operated under 14CFR91 originating from Boeing Field, Seattle, Washington, approximately 1400 on the afternoon of the accident. The pilot reported that following the crash; he and his passenger exited the aircraft noting fuel spilling from the left fuel tank and contacted the operator by cell phone advising them of the accident. A search was initiated and the two occupants were found the following morning. The pilot and passenger were both interviewed by an inspector assigned to the Federal Aviation Administration's Flight Standards District Office, Renton, Washington (refer to ATTACHMENTS P-I and P-II). The pilot reported in the interview that he had departed Boeing field with the non-rated passenger and headed towards the intended patrol area. During the flight to the patrol area, he had demonstrated some basic flight maneuvers to the passenger, who had never been in a small aircraft before, and then allowed the passenger to fly the aircraft. The pilot reported that as the passenger, who was occupying the left seat, flew the aircraft the pilot acted as fire spotter. He also recalled that the power was set to 23 inches of manifold pressure and 2,400 rpm and that the aircraft was operating between 3,000 and 4,000 feet above mean sea level. The pilot reported that the ceiling was about a 4,000 to 5,000 foot "ragged overcast" and that he had encountered rain showers earlier in the flight. According to the FAA inspector's interview transcript, the pilot stated that "...While the aircraft was maneuvered along a southeasterly heading into a canyon, [the pilot] noted that the aircraft's performance seemed to be deteriorating. Shortly thereafter, [the pilot] heard the engine start 'coughing,' at which time, he took control of the airplane. [The pilot] stated that there was about a 10 to 15 second period between the time he initially noted the decrease in performance, to when the engine coughing began, and that though he was approximately 1,000 feet above the ground, he was only 200 feet horizontally from the rising terrain...." The pilot reported checking the fuel selector "ON," the mixture control "FULL RICH," the propeller control "FULL FORWARD," and the throttle "FULL OPEN," but this resulted in no change in engine performance. He further reported that there was no time to continue trouble-shooting the problem including "...checking the carburetor heat..." and that at the time of the crash "...it was likely that the engine was still producing power, but not much...." When the FAA inspector asked the pilot what he felt had happened, the pilot stated that "...he probably had encountered carburetor icing..." and that "...the last time he had checked any of his engine instruments was approximately 10 minutes prior to the accident...." The FAA inspector inquired if the pilot had ever encountered carburetor icing and he replied "...he had not...." The pilot was also asked what mountain flying experience training he had received and he replied that "...he had no formal [mountain] flight training, but that he had watched a 'Jeppesen' video on the subject, and that he had given several mountain-flying checkouts himself...." The aviation surface weather observation taken at McCord Air Force base at 1555 on the afternoon of the accident recorded a surface temperature and dew point of 18 degrees and 7 degrees Celsius respectively. The observation site is 323 feet above sea level and lies 28 nautical miles and 260 degrees magnetic west of the accident site (refer to CHART I and DIAGRAM CARB ICE-I). The accident site was fixed using a GPS (global positioning system) unit during the search and rescue. The aircraft was located within a draw along the South Fork of the South Prairie Creek about 2,500 feet above sea level (refer to CHART II). The elevation of the terrain within the canyon rose 2,500 feet along the South Fork axis. The average distance of this terrain rise was approximately 12,000 horizontal feet along the axis, with the last 4,500 feet rising a total of 2,000 feet, a significantly steeper gradient. An FAA inspector interviewed one of the Pierce County Sheriff's deputies who surveyed the accident site (refer to ATTACHMENT INT-I). The deputy reported that the carburetor heat control in the aircraft was found in the "OFF" position (from Pierce County Incident Report No. 01-248-0904). The aircraft was subsequently recovered from the site and transported to Discount Aircraft Salvage, Deer Park, Washington. The aircraft's engine was test run under the supervision of an NTSB investigator, and although the engine operated, a power degradation was noted. Examination and testing of the magnetos revealed that the left Slick magneto's coil was not operating. It could not be determined whether the inoperative magneto was related to impact damage during the crash or pre-existed the impact. The pilot reported to the FAA inspector that prior to takeoff "...all systems appeared to be functioning normally...."

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time15:30 PDT
Nearest Airport0nm
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftCessna 172RG
Tail NumberN44EF
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · O-360-F1A6 · Reciprocating · 180
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury Summary2 injuries (2 minor injuries)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor2
Uninjured0
Total2
Crew 1Age 25 · Second Class · Minor

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind5 kt
Visibility7 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point64 F / 45 C
Altimeter30.17 inHg
Observation Time22:55
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data