Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Aiken, TX
The pilot was maneuvering the agricultural airplane to enter a field and commence spraying, when at 120 feet agl, the engine lost power. The pilot attempted to restart the engine; however, the engine did not restart. During the ensuing forced landing, the airplane contacted circular rows of cotton, before coming to rest upright. The engine was examined at the manufacturer's facility and silicon sealant was observed on the base flanges of the #1, #2, #4, and #6 cylinders and on the crankcase mating surfaces. Fretting was observed on the base flanges of the cylinders, on the mating surface of the crankcase halves, and on the main bearing bosses. The #2 main bearing was observed fragmented and the bearing's bore was cracked and damaged. Additionally, it was observed that the crankshaft was fractured between the #2 main bearing and #3 crankshaft cheek. According to a TCM metallurgist, the fatigue fracture's origin was determined to be at the aft radius of the #2 main bearing. The silicon sealant prevented proper torqueing of the bolts that mate the crankcase halves and led to vibration at the crankcase mating surfaces. The #2 main bearing then shifted and failed, resulting in a loss of engine power.
the application of silicon sealant to the crankcase mating surfaces by maintenance personnel, which resulted in improper torque on the bolts which mate the crankcase halves, vibration, and the subsequent failure of the #2 main crankshaft bearing. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
On September 27, 2001, at 0905 central daylight time, a Cessna T188C agricultural airplane, N4629J, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a loss of engine power while maneuvering near Aiken, Texas. The airplane was registered to a private individual and was operated by Addison Spraying Service, of Plainview, Texas. The commercial pilot, sole occupant of the airplane, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and a flight plan was not filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 137 aerial application flight. The local flight originated from the Hale County Airport, Plainview, Texas, at 0900. According to the pilot, the flight was part of the boll weevil eradication program. The pilot was maneuvering the airplane to enter a field and commence spraying, when at 120 feet agl, the engine lost power. The pilot attempted to restart the engine; however, the engine did not restart. During the ensuing forced landing, the airplane contacted circular rows of cotton, the left main landing gear separated from the airplane, and the left wing's rear spar was damaged. The airplane came to rest upright. The Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) TSIO-520-T engine was examined by an FAA inspector. The propeller rotated when it was manipulated by hand; however, none of the accessory drive gears rotated as the propeller was turned. The engine was sent to the TCM Factory in Mobile, Alabama, for further examination. The engine was examined under supervision of an NTSB investigator at TCM. The oil sump was removed and ferrous debris was observed in the sump. The oil pump was removed, disassembled, and observed to be lubricated and intact. The engine crankcase and cylinders were disassembled. A silicon residue was observed on the base flanges of the #1, #2, #4, and #6 cylinders and on the mating surface of the crankcase halves (backbone). Fretting was observed on the base flanges of the cylinders, on the crankcase mating surfaces, and on the main bearing bosses. The crankshaft was observed to be fractured between the #2 main bearing and #3 crankshaft cheek. According to a TCM metallurgist the fatigue fracture's origin was determined to be at the aft radius of the #2 main bearing. The #2 main bearing was fragmented, and the bearing's bore was cracked and damaged. According to the engine maintenance logbook, on May 3, 1999, the engine underwent its last field overhaul, during which the crankshaft was installed in the engine. On May 10, 2001, the engine underwent its most recent annual inspection at a time of 664.0 hours since overhaul. At the time of the accident, the engine had accumulated 777.0 hours since overhaul.