Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

July 5, 2002 · Cessna 150 · N8894G

Griswold, CT

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
July 5, 2002
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (1 uninjured)
Location
Griswold, CT
Aircraft
Cessna 150
Tail Number
N8894G
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
IAD02LA068

The non-certificated pilot made an emergency landing in an alfalfa field adjacent to a privately maintained airport. Instead of towing the airplane to the airport, the pilot elected to take off from the 1,700-1,800 foot long field, which he described as "rolling and a little bumpy", with a tailwind. Additionally, there was a 25-foot high tree line located at the departure end of the field. During the takeoff roll, the pilot had to keep the wings from contacting the ground, and said that he should have aborted the takeoff after the airplane became momentarily airborne. The airplane climbed after it became airborne a second time. The airplane brushed the trees, and the pilot made a hard landing in another alfalfa field located on the other side of the tree line. Interpolation of the Cessna 150 Pilot Operating Handbook (POH) Takeoff Performance Chart revealed that the airplane required 2,009 feet of takeoff distance to clear a 50 foot obstacle from a dry, grass runway with an 8-knot tailwind. The FAA suspended the pilot's certificates and ratings in 1999, and his most recent FAA medical certificate was issued on May 21, 1998. The pilot stated that there were no mechanical deficiencies with the airplane or engine. Witnesses reported the winds at the time of takeoff consisted of a tailwind of 8 to 10 knots.

NTSB Probable Cause

the pilot's improper pre-flight planning and decision to depart a field with insufficient runway. Factors were the rough/uneven terrain, high obstructions and the tailwind.

Full Narrative

On July 5, 2002, at 1628 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 150, N8894G, was substantially damaged during a forced landing shortly after take-off from an alfalfa field in Griswold, Connecticut. The non-certificated pilot was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the personal flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. The pilot stated that he made an emergency landing in an alfalfa field on June 20, 2002, due to smoke in the cockpit. He then waited two weeks for the property owner to mow the field before he could take-off. In a written statement, the pilot said the alfalfa field was approximately 2,000 feet long with a 25-foot high tree line at the departure end. He described the field as rolling and a little bumpy. The pilot taxied to the far end of the field and departed to the north/northwest. He said: "While going over the rolling hill (nose off the ground), making a slight left turn, I had to be careful so the wings would not make ground contact. I then became airborne for about 2 seconds, then made ground contact again. At this point, I knew I should have aborted, but elected to continue." The airplane continued down the field for the next 90 to 120 feet at 50-55 miles per hour with the nose wheel off the ground, until the airplane became airborne. The pilot stated that he cleared the trees by approximately 10 feet, but then lost lift due to a downdraft. The pilot reduced power, lowered the nose, and landed hard in another alfalfa field. Two witnesses observed the airplane depart from the field, which was located behind their homes. According to one witness, she heard the airplane taxiing around in the backyard and called her aunt, who lives next door, to find out what the pilot was doing. Her aunt said that the pilot intended to take-off the following day and was just testing the field. However, the witness saw the airplane take-off, then heard the sound of a crash. A second witness said she heard the pilot start the airplane's engine and taxi down toward her niece's home. The witness said that her niece called and said that the pilot was definitely going to take-off. According to the witness: "I went out and sure enough he was in the air - not too high - close to trees near our garage and went higher and instantly took a nose dive." A third witness said that the airplane departed with a 8-10 knot tailwind, and the tail of the airplane brushed the tree tops as it flew over them. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector performed an on-scene examination. According to the inspector, the firewall was buckled, and both wings were damaged. No mechanical deficiencies were noted with the airplane or engine. The inspector also described the field as rolling and bumpy, and estimated the length to be about 1,700-1,800 feet long. The FAA had suspended the pilot's certificates and ratings in 1999. Additionally, the pilot's most recent FAA medical certificate was issued on May 21, 1998, and he did not have a current biennial flight review. The pilot reported a total of 5,000 flight hours, of which, 2,000 hours were in make and model. He also reported that there were no mechanical deficiencies with the airplane. Weather at Groton/New London (GON) Airport, Groton/New London, Connecticut, 16 NM southwest, at 1606, included wind from 320 degrees at 12 knots gusting to 21 knots, clear skies, temperature 79 degrees F, and dewpoint 55 degrees F. Interpolation of the Cessna 150 Pilot Operating Handbook (POH) Take-off Performance Chart, the airplane required 2,009 feet of takeoff distance to clear a 50 foot obstacle from a dry grass runway with an 8-knot tailwind. Additionally, Spruce Airport, a private airport with a 1,735 foot long grass runway, was located directly across the street from the alfalfa field. According to the FAA inspector, the airport owner had offered to help the pilot move the airplane to the airport for a small fee. The pilot refused the offer.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time16:28 EDT
Nearest Airport0nm
Runway010
Runway Length1750 ft
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftCessna 150
Tail NumberN8894G
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsContinental · O-200-A · Reciprocating · 100
Seats2

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (1 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured1
Total1
Crew 1Age 68 · Third Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind320° @ 12 kt, gusting 21 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point55
Altimeter29.88 inHg
Observation Time20:56
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data