Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

November 23, 2002 · Peterson Dragonfly · N2448

Mulino, OR

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
November 23, 2002
Injury Outcomes
1 injury (1 serious injury)
Location
Mulino, OR
Aircraft
Peterson Dragonfly
Tail Number
N2448
Injuries
Serious
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
SEA03LA011

The student pilot, who was also the owner/builder of the experimental aircraft, was conducting a local personal pleasure flight when the aircraft's engine suddenly lost power. Because he was unable to get the aircraft restarted, the pilot elected to attempt a forced landing in a nearby field. During the attempted landing, the aircraft encountered very rough terrain and sustained substantial damage. Although an initial inspection of the aircraft disclosed no anomalies or malfunctions in the engine, it was later determined that the pilot had altered the fuel system from that shown in the aircraft plans. That alteration created a situation where the engine was starved of fuel when the pilot turned on the electric fuel pump that transferred fuel to the header tank from a line downstream of the gascolator.

NTSB Probable Cause

Fuel starvation of the engine while in cruise flight due to the owner/builder's alteration of the fuel system from that shown in the aircrafts plans. Factors include very rough terrain in the area where the pilot found it necessary to make his forced landing.

Full Narrative

On November 23, 2002, approximately 1240 Pacific standard time, an experimental Peterson Dragonfly, N2448, impacted the terrain during an attempted forced landing in a rough field about three miles west of Mulino, Oregon. The student pilot, who was the sole occupant, received serious injuries, and the aircraft, which was built, owned, and operated by the pilot, sustained substantial damage. The 14 CFR Part 91 personal pleasure flight, which departed Mulino Airport, Mulino, Oregon, about 10 minutes prior to the accident, was being operated in visual meteorological conditions. No flight plan had been filed. The ELT, which was activated by the accident sequence, was turned off at the scene. According to the pilot, the aircraft's engine stopped suddenly while he was on a short flight to the west of Mulino. After the engine stopped, the pilot tried applying carburetor heat and then attempted a restart. When the engine did not start, he switched to the header tank and made sure that his electric fuel pump was on, and then tried a restart again, with no success. After attempting a third unsuccessful start, the pilot elected to attempt a forced landing in a nearby field. Although the pilot was able to make it to the field without engine power, during the touchdown on the very rough terrain, the aircraft sustained substantial damage. A post-accident inspection of the aircraft by the owner and an FAA Airworthiness inspector found no indication that there had been any anomaly or malfunction in the engine. A further inspection of the aircraft's systems revealed that the pilot had altered the fuel system from that described in the aircraft plans. The alteration performed by the pilot allowed fuel to be transferred to the header tank from a fuel line downstream of the gascolator bowl by way of an electrical fuel pump. In further discussions with the owner, the FAA inspector determined that just prior to the loss of power the pilot had turned on the subject pump. According to the inspector, both he and the owner agreed that the loss of power was due to the engine being starved of fuel when the pump was turned on in order to transfer fuel to the header tank. The aircraft, which had been manufactured in 2001, had been flown a total of about two hours.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time12:40 PST
Nearest Airport0nm
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftPeterson Dragonfly
Tail NumberN2448
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsHapi · 60-20M · Reciprocating · 60
Seats2

People & Injuries

Injury Summary1 injury (1 serious injury)
Fatal0
Serious1
Minor0
Uninjured0
Total1
Crew 1Age 54 · Third Class · Serious

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind270° @ 5 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingOvercast 3500 ft
Temperature / Dew Point50 / 0 C
Altimeter0
Weather SourceWIT

Appendix: Source Data