Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Santa Fe, NM
While taxiing from landing following a post-annual inspection flight, the right main landing gear collapsed. Maintenance records indicated both main landing gear push-pull tubes had been removed when the gear was rigged. The service manual requires the drive tubes --- not the push-pull tubes --- be disconnected. The left push-pull appeared to have been installed upside down and had not been properly aligned. Aircraft load was transmitted to the center pivot on the main landing gear bellcrank, causing it to fail. NTSB's Materials Laboratory said there was a "ductile overstress fracture in direct shear," causing instantaneous overload of the bolt.
total failure of the main landing gear due to improper installation of the push-pull tubes by maintenance personnel, and their failure to follow proper procedures/directives.
On June 17, 2005, at 1228 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 340A, N155RP, piloted by an airline transport pilot, was substantially damaged when the right main landing gear collapsed while taxiing from landing at Santa Fe Municipal Airport (SAF), Santa Fe, New Mexico. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The local personal flight was being conducted under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91 without a flight plan. The pilot was not injured. The flight originated at Santa Fe, New Mexico, approximately 1155. The pilot said this was the first flight for the airplane after an annual inspection, and he was "breaking in a new cylinder." The flight, which included an in-flight gear extension and retraction, was uneventful. After landing and while taxiing back to the hangar, the right main landing gear collapsed and the right wing struck the ground. Postaccident inspection disclosed multiple broken ribs in the right wing. A bolt attached to the lower portion of the bell crank was sheared and the main landing gear trunion was broken. An FAA inspector said that during the annual inspection, maintenance personnel had improperly rigged the main landing gear. According to maintenance records, both main landing gear push-pull tubes were removed when the gear were rigged. The Cessna 340A service manual requires the drive tubes --- not the push-pull tubes --- be disconnected. The left push-pull appeared to be installed upside down. When the center attach point bolt sheared, the load was transmitted to the clevis on the landing gear trunion and it failed. A Cessna Aircraft Company spokesman agreed, saying the failure mode of the bolt suggested improper rigging of the overcenter mechanism. When the push-pull tubes were reinstalled, they were not properly aligned. Aircraft load was transmitted to the center pivot on the main landing gear bellcrank, causing it to fail. The failed bolt was examined by NTSB's Materials Laboratory. Their report confirmed "ductile overstress fracture in direct shear" caused by instantaneous overload of the bolt. Numerous attempts to obtain a completed NTSB Form 6120.12 from the pilot were unsuccessful.