Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Toms River, NJ
In preparation for his commercial pilot check ride, the flight instructor had the private pilot perform a short field takeoff. During the climbout, the airplane encountered minor turbulence with "some" fluctuation in airspeed. The flight instructor then had the private pilot perform a short field landing, and during the final approach leg, the private pilot chose an aiming point "just prior to the start of the runway" to begin his flare. Everything appeared normal on approach until the airplane suddenly sank, then impacted the ground about 10 feet prior to the runway. The airplane subsequently struck the "lip" of the runway, bounced, and impacted the runway "hard" on its landing gear. A postflight examination of the airplane revealed a flat nose landing gear strut. Winds were from straight ahead, at 12 knots, gusting to 20 knots. The private pilot reported that due to the proximity of the ground, and the speed at which the sink occurred, no recovery techniques could be applied. There were no mechanical anomalies noted with the airplane.
The private pilot's failure to attain the proper touchdown point, and the flight instructor's inadequate remedial action, which resulted in a landing short of the runway. A contributing factor was the gusty wind conditions.
On October 31, 2006, at 1315 eastern standard time, a Cessna 182RG, N6362T, was substantially damaged while landing at the Robert J. Miller Air Park (MJX), Toms River, New Jersey. The certificated flight instructor and certificated private pilot were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the local instructional flight conducted under 14 CFR Part 91. According to the private pilot, the purpose of the flight was to prepare him for his commercial pilot checkride. The private pilot first conducted a short field takeoff without incident, and during the climbout, "minor" turbulence was encountered, along with "some fluctuation in airspeed." The flight instructor then requested that the private pilot perform a short field landing. The private pilot turned onto the final approach leg and picked an aiming point "just prior" to the beginning of the runway to begin his flare. Everything appeared normal on the approach until the pilots felt the airplane suddenly sink, then impact the ground before reaching the runway. The private pilot also reported that the sink occurred so close to the ground, that "a recovery technique could not be applied." He further noted that a postflight examination of the airplane revealed that the hydraulic strut of the nose landing gear was flat. According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, the airplane contacted the ground about 10 feet prior to the threshold of runway 24, then struck the "lip" of the runway, bounced, and impacted the runway "hard" on its landing gear. The inspector noted substantial damage to the airplane's firewall. Neither the pilots nor the FAA inspector reported any mechanical anomalies with the airplane prior to the accident. Winds, reported at an airport 14 miles to the west, were from 240 degrees at 12 knots, gusting to 20 knots.