Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

October 31, 2006 · Cessna 172S · N2097G

Richfield, UT

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
October 31, 2006
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (1 uninjured)
Location
Richfield, UT
Aircraft
Cessna 172S
Tail Number
N2097G
Operator
Conerstone Aviation
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
SEA07LA013

On his first approach, the student pilot was too high, and he executed a go-around. During his second attempt, he noticed that there were gusty crosswinds near the ground, but he felt that they were of a magnitude that he would be able to handle. The second approach and initial touchdown were without incident, but soon after the beginning of the landing roll, the airplane was hit by a gust of wind from the right. The gust pushed the airplane toward the left side of the runway, and lifted the right wing. Although the pilot attempted corrective action, he was unable to keep the airplane from departing the left side of the paved runway surface and entering an area of soft terrain. While he was attempting to get the airplane onto the runway, it encountered a mound/berm of dirt, and flipped over onto its back. There was no evidence of any flight control or nose wheel steering problems, and according to the student pilot, the only problem was his inability to compensate for the gusty crosswind conditions.

NTSB Probable Cause

The student pilot's inability to compensate for the gusty crosswinds during the initial part of the landing roll, which resulted in a loss of control and a noseover. Factors associated with the accident are gusty crosswinds, and a mound/berm of dirt alongside the runway.

Full Narrative

On October 31, 2006, approximately 1450 mountain standard time, a Cessna 172S, N2097G, nosed over after inadvertently departing the runway during the landing roll at Richfield Municipal Airport, Richfield, Utah. The student pilot, who was the sole occupant, was not injured, but the aircraft, which is owned by Mountain Air Aviation LLC, and operated by Cornerstone Aviation, sustained substantial damage. The 14 CFR Part 91 solo cross-country instructional flight, which departed Provo, Utah, about 90 minutes prior to the accident, was being operated in visual meteorological conditions. The pilot was on a VFR flight plan. There was no report of an ELT activation. According to the student pilot, his first approach was too high, and because he thought he would be landing long, he elected to execute a go-around. During his second attempt, he noticed that there were gusty crosswinds near the ground, but he felt that they were of a magnitude that he would be able to handle. The second approach and initial touchdown were without incident, but soon after the beginning of the landing roll, the aircraft was hit by a gust of wind from the right. The gust pushed the aircraft toward the left side of the runway and lifted its right wing. Although the pilot attempted corrective action, he was unable to keep the aircraft from departing the left side of the paved runway surface and entering an area of soft terrain. While he was attempting to get the aircraft back onto the runway, it encountered a mound/berm of dirt, and flipped over onto its back. According to the student pilot, there was no evidence of any flight control or nose wheel steering problems. He further stated that the only problem was his inability to compensate for the gusty crosswind conditions.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time14:50 MST
Nearest AirportRichfield Municipal Airport (0nm)
Runway01
Runway Length6600 ft
Runway Width75 ft
Flight Plan FiledVFR
Flight Plan ActivatedYes
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftCessna 172S
Tail NumberN2097G
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
OperatorConerstone Aviation
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · IO-360-L2A · Reciprocating · 180
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (1 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured1
Total1
Crew 1Age 37 · Third Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind280° @ 10 kt, gusting 15 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point61 F / 19 C
Altimeter0
Weather SourcePILO

Appendix: Source Data