Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

June 23, 2007 · Zaverton Elmer PJ260 SR Aero Sport · N85136

Lehighton, PA

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
June 23, 2007
Injury Outcomes
2 injuries (2 minor injuries)
Location
Lehighton, PA
Aircraft
Zaverton Elmer PJ260 SR Aero Sport
Tail Number
N85136
Operator
William Francis Vose
Injuries
Minor
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
ATL07CA095

A commercial pilot was flying with the student pilot/airplane owner on a demonstration flight. In statements provided to the NTSB investigator-in-charge, the pilots contradicted each other on who was flying the airplane immediately prior to the accident. The student pilot said the commercial pilot was flying, and allowed the airplane to get too slow, and the airplane stalled and entered a flat spin. The commercial pilot said the student pilot demonstrated a stall, failed to recover, and the airplane entered a flat spin. Both pilots agree that the student was on the controls during the attempted spin recovery. The airplane did not recover from the spin, and collided with trees, sustaining substantial damage to the wings and fuselage. A postaccident inspection by an FAA inspector disclosed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical anomalies. The commercial pilot stated that he was unaware that the student pilot was not a certificated pilot.

NTSB Probable Cause

The failure of the pilot to maintain sufficient airspeed while maneuvering to avoid a stall, which resulted in an inadvertent stall/spin, and collision with trees and terrain.

Full Narrative

The student pilot stated the airplane was for sale. A commercial pilot had arrived at the airport to look at the airplane. The commercial pilot asked if he could fly the airplane. The student pilot got into the back seat and the commercial pilot got into the front seat. The student pilot was flying the airplane. They flew over and circled the State Park. The commercial pilot took over the controls and headed back towards Beltsville at 2,500 feet. The student pilot stated that the commercial pilot "was flying the airplane fairly slow and making some easy turns. The airspeed seemed to decrease a little" and the student pilot said the commercial pilot "started a left turn at a slow airspeed. the left wing dropped, the airplane stalled, and entered a flat spin." The student pilot "took over the controls, applied power and opposite rudder. The airplane would not recover. The airplane collided with trees and the ground." The commercial pilot exited the airplane first and assisted the student pilot out of the airplane. They both walked through the woods and came to a highway. They walked over to a gas station and they asked the attendant to call 911 and tell the 911 operators that the pilots were ok. The student pilot then went home to see his girl friend and children. The commercial pilot went to the airport and departed. According to the commercial pilot, he spoke with the student pilot on the morning of the accident and informed him that he would fly in around 1200, so that he could see the airplane. He informed the student pilot that he did not have any tail wheel experience, and that the purchase of the airplane would be contingent upon his being able to store the airplane at his hangar. The commercial pilot stated that the student pilot demonstrated the airplane and then let him take control. Then the student pilot took the controls back and we just flew around and then he brought the airplane up into a stall. We came out of the stall and just started spinning straight down. I thought to myself, "when is he going to get us out of the spin? and I looked down at the controls in the cockpit and he had full left stick, full right stick, full forward, full aft stick; he brought the power back on the engine and the plane just kept going straight down, there was nothing anyone could do. We crashed through the trees and hit the ground." fortunately, we were able to walk away. According to the commercial pilot he was not made aware that the student pilot was not a certificated pilot. In addition, the student pilot did not provide a completed pilot/operator report as requested. Examination of the airplane by an FAA Inspector found substantial to both wings, the airframe, and the engine. There were no mechanical problems reported by the pilot or discovered during the post-accident examination of the airplane.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time15:13 EDT
Nearest Airport0nm
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftZaverton Elmer PJ260 SR Aero Sport
Tail NumberN85136
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
OperatorWilliam Francis Vose
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · IO-360 · Reciprocating · 175
Seats2

People & Injuries

Injury Summary2 injuries (2 minor injuries)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor2
Uninjured0
Total2
Crew 1Age 46 · Third Class · Minor

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind330° @ 13 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point39 C
Altimeter29.92 inHg
Observation Time14:51
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data