Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Salem, IN
A witness reported that after takeoff, when approximately 20 feet above ground level (agl), the gyroplane drifted to the right and the tail turned "abruptly" to the right about 90-degrees. The pilot reduced power and regained control. The gyroplane returned to the runway centerline and the pilot appeared to be setting up for a landing. However, when the gyroplane was about 5 feet above the runway, the pilot increased engine power and started to climb. About 75 to 100 feet agl, the tail of the gyroplane again turned "abruptly" to the right, the nose pitched up "steeply," and the aircraft rolled inverted. It subsequently impacted the ground on the rotor mast. A post accident examination did not reveal any anomalies consistent with a pre-impact failure or malfunction. The pilot did not have any recollection of the accident flight. He reported that he had owned the accident gyroplane for 2-1/2 years, but he was still just learning. He soloed the previous summer and had accumulated about 5 hours of solo flight time. He had about 20 hours total flight time in gyroplanes. The pilot held a private pilot certificate with a single-engine land airplane rating, with about 280 hours flight time in airplanes.
The pilot's failure to maintain control of the gyroplane during climbout after takeoff.
On December 14, 2007, at 1426 eastern standard time, an amateur-built Levick RAF-2000-GTX-SE gyroplane, N24DN, piloted by a private pilot, was destroyed when it impacted terrain following an in-flight loss of control after takeoff from Salem Municipal Airport (I83), Salem, Indiana. The aircraft had departed from runway 28 (2,500 feet by 50 feet, asphalt) shortly before the accident. The personal flight was being conducted under 14 CFR Part 91 without a flight plan. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. The pilot sustained serious injuries. The local flight was departing at the time of the accident. The pilot stated that he did not have any recollection of the flight or of the accident sequence. A witness to the accident reported that the pilot taxied onto runway 28 and began the takeoff roll. He stated that the gyroplane rotated at about the runway numbers. Approximately 20 feet above ground level (agl), the gyroplane drifted to the right and the tail turned "abruptly" to the right about 90-degrees. The pilot reduced power and regained control. The gyroplane returned to the runway centerline and the pilot appeared to be setting up for a landing. However, when the aircraft was about 5 feet above the runway, the pilot increased engine power and started to climb. About 75 to 100 feet agl, the tail of the aircraft again turned "abruptly" to the right, the nose pitched up "steeply," and the aircraft rolled inverted. It subsequently impacted the ground on the rotor mast. A post accident examination of the gyroplane was conducted by Federal Aviation Administration inspectors. No anomalies consistent with a pre-impact failure or malfunction were identified. All three composite propeller blades were fragmented. The rotor blades, hub and a portion of the mast had separated from the airframe and were located with the main wreckage. The rudder had also separated from the airframe and was located with the main wreckage. The flight control system was examined. Discontinuities in the flight control system appeared consistent with overload failures sustained during impact. The pilot reported that he had owned the accident aircraft for 2-1/2 years, but he was still just learning to fly a gyroplane. He soloed the previous summer and had accumulated about 5 hours of solo flight time. He had about 20 hours total flight time in gyroplanes. The pilot held a private pilot certificate with a single-engine land airplane rating. He had acquired about 280 hours flight time in airplanes. A condition inspection of the gyroplane was completed on May 26, 2007. The aircraft had accumulated 227.5 hours flight time at the time of the inspection.