Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Battle Creek, MI
The twin-engine airplane sustained substantial damage due to a separated propeller blade tip impacting the airplane's nose during cruise. The tip separation exhibited signs of fatigue failure. Witness marks consistent with tool file marks made during a leading edge repair were found at the area of the origin of fatigue. According to maintenance information published by the propeller manufacturer, a 10x magnifying glass should be used to examine repairs to ensure damage, file marks, and any course surface finish are removed prior to returning the propeller back to service.. The airplane accumulated a total time of 1,997 hours.
The in-flight separation of the tip of a propeller blade due to metal fatigue that resulted from an inadequate inspection and repair.
On June 8, 2008, at 1315 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-44-180, N159WM, sustained substantial damage due to a separated propeller blade tip impacting the airplane's nose during cruise near Battle Creek, Michigan. The airplane landed without further incident at the W K Kellogg Airport (BTL), near Battle Creek, Michigan. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The 14 CFR Part 91 instructional flight was not operating on a flight plan. The certified flight instructor (CFI) and the commercial pilot receiving dual instruction were uninjured. The local flight originated from BTL about 1230. The flight was returning to BTL at the time of the accident. CFI's report, in part, stated: A large BANG was heard and felt 8 to 10 miles south east of the airport. At that point we scanned the gauges and saw no sign of problems. When we looked out the windscreen; however we saw a large depression in the nose section of the aircraft. Initially we thought we had ... a bird strike. N159WM was a 2002, Piper PA-44-180, which was a twin engine, four seat airplane with serial number 4496159. The airplane was powered by two Lycoming engines. Each engine drove its own Hartzell propeller. The propeller blade was a model FJC7666A-2R that was installed in a model HC-C2YR-2CLEUF hub assembly. The serial number of the blade with the tip separation was J73543. The airplane accumulated a total time of 1,997 hours. The outboard section of the remaining propeller blade was cut away and sent to the National Transportation Safety Board's Materials Laboratory. A Senior Materials Engineer examined the propeller section and produced Materials Laboratory Factual Report number 08-097. The report referred to repair data from the propeller manufacturer's website indicating that a 10x magnifying glass should be used to examine repairs to ensure damage, file marks, and any course surface finish are removed prior to returning the propeller back to service. The laboratory report, in part, stated: Fatigue features emanated from a fatigue origin area located at the leading edge near the flat side of the blade ... . ... Angled file marks consistent with a leading edge repair were observed between the leading edge and the flat side of the blade ... .