Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
New London, WI
The student pilot and flight instructor of the powered parachute had accomplished approximately 10 touch-and-goes prior to the accident, and "everything went perfectly." However, when the aircraft touched down on the final landing the nose wheel support failed causing the aircraft to ground loop. During the accident sequence the steering bar struck the student pilot in the chest. A postaccident examination revealed that the nose wheel front fork support had failed at a welded joint immediately forward of the airframe attachment bolt. Visual examination of the weld indicated a lack of penetration at the joint. In addition, the weld material did not appear to be of a uniform thickness. The manufacturer subsequently issued a service bulletin advising owners of two failures of the welded joint on the front fork support. The manufacturer recommended that supports be replaced with a Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) welded support. The original support may have been Metal Inert Gas (MIG) welded without proper penetration, according to the bulletin.
The pilot's loss of directional control during landing due to failure of the nose wheel support as a result of an inadequate weld.
On September 20, 2008, about 0930 central daylight time, an experimental Powrachute Pegasus powered-parachute, N7084L, piloted by a flight instructor and student pilot, sustained minor damage when the nose landing gear collapsed during landing at Mark's Park and Airfield (3WN4) near New London, Wisconsin. The student pilot was seriously injured during the event. The flight instructor was not injured. The dual instructional flight was being conducted under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 without a flight plan. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The local flight took off about 0830. The pilot's were practicing touch-and-goes at time of the accident. The student pilot reported that he had observed 5 or 6 touch-and-goes from the rear seat, as the flight instructor flew from the front seat. He controlled the throttle during this initial portion of the flight. He and his instructor then switched positions, with the student pilot flying from the front seat and the instructor observing from the rear seat. He completed another 5 or 6 touch-and-goes as the flying pilot and "everything went perfect." However, when he touched down on the final landing, the nose wheel support failed causing the aircraft to ground loop. During the accident sequence, the steering bar struck him in the chest. He was hospitalized for treatment of the serious injuries sustained in the accident. A post accident examination revealed that the nose wheel front fork support had failed at a welded joint immediately forward of the airframe attachment bolt. Visual examination of the weld indicated a lack of penetration at the joint. In addition, the weld material did not appear to be of a uniform thickness. Subsequent to the accident, the manufacturer issued a service bulletin advising owners of two failures of the welded joint on the front fork support. The manufacturer recommended that supports be replaced with a Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) welded support. The original support may have been Metal Inert Gas (MIG) welded without proper penetration, according to the bulletin.