Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Calexico, CA
The pilot reported that approximately 20 minutes after takeoff the engine began running rough. The pilot initiated a forced landing to a nearby field, and during the landing roll, the airplane nosed over in the soft, uneven ground. After the accident, the pilot examined the engine and airframe and reported finding no indication as to why the engine ran rough.
Not determined-Not determined-(general)-(general)-Unknown/Not determined - C
On March 3, 2009, about 1020 Pacific standard time, a Maule M-5, N9166E, sustained substantial damage following an off airport landing in an open field three miles west of Calexico, California. The commercial pilot, the registered owner/operator of the airplane and passenger were not injured. The airplane was being operated as a visual flight rules (VFR) aerial observation flight under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed. The local flight departed Calexico approximately 20 minutes prior to the accident. During a telephone conversation with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator-in-charge (IIC), the pilot reported that about 20 minutes after takeoff, while maneuvering, the airplane developed a rough running engine and he initiated a precautionary landing to a nearby field. During the landing roll, the airplane encountered soft, uneven terrain and nosed over. Examination of the airplane by the pilot revealed that the vertical stabilizer and rudder were structurally damaged. Post accident examination of the engine and airframe, by the pilot, revealed no indication as to the basis of the rough running engine. Subsequent to the examination, the pilot began repairs on the engine and airframe. The engine and airframe were not examined by the National Transportation Safety Board.