Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

July 31, 2009 · Raytheon Aircraft BE-400A · N679SJ

Sugar Land, TX

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Incident
Date
July 31, 2009
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (8 uninjured)
Location
Sugar Land, TX
Aircraft
Raytheon Aircraft BE-400A
Tail Number
N679SJ
Operator
Comtran International
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Minor
NTSB Number
CEN09IA481

The airplane was on departure roll approaching 95 knots when one large and two smaller birds were observed flying across the plane’s flight path from left to right. The pilots were unable to react before at least one of the birds struck the airplane. The pilot stated that the right engine immediately lost all power and the crew subsequently rejected the takeoff. Postflight examination of the airplane revealed that all but one of the right engine’s fan blades were fractured and the inlet duct had separated from the front of the engine and was hanging by a bleed air duct. Bird remains from a 1 ½- to 2-pound juvenile yellow-crowned night heron were found on the runway and in the right engine. Examination of the engine revealed that the engine spinner had separated from the engine due to the bird strike and entered the engine, resulting in the liberation of the fan blades and subsequent failure of the engine. The engine was certified to ingest a four-pound goose. However, the certification requirements in place at the time did not require the spinner to be tested during the certification process. The certification requirements were later updated to require testing of the spinner.

NTSB Probable Cause

The failure of the spinner following an unavoidable bird strike. Contributing to the incident were the inadequate engine bird strike certification requirements in place at the time the engine was certified.

Full Narrative

HISTORY OF FLIGHT On July 31, 2009, at 1516 central daylight time, a Raytheon Aircraft Company BE-400A airplane, N679SJ, received minor damage after being struck in the number two engine by at least one bird while on initial takeoff from Sugar Land Municipal Airport (SGR), Houston, Texas. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the incident. The flight was being conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 with an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan. The cross country flight was originating from SGR with Lakefront Airport (NEW), New Orleans, Louisiana, as the final destination. The pilot stated the airplane was on departure roll approaching 95 knots when one large and two smaller birds were observed flying across the airplane’s flight path from left to right. He described the two smaller birds as "sparrow” sized and the larger bird as a heron about four or five times larger than the smaller birds. The pilots were unable to react before at least one of the birds struck the airplane. The pilot stated the right engine immediately lost all power and they rejected the takeoff. Post-flight examination of the airplane revealed all but one of the right engine fan blades were fractured and the inlet duct had separated from the front of the engine and was hanging from the engine by a bleed air tube. AIRCRAFT INFORMATION The airplane, a Raytheon Aircraft Company BE-400A model, was powered by two Pratt & Whitney Canada (PWC) JT15D-5 engines. The PWC JT15D-5 engine was a dual-spool turbofan that featured a one-stage fan, a one-stage axial flow booster, a one- stage centrifugal flow high pressure compressor (HPC), a reverse flow annular combustor, a one-stage high pressure turbine that drove the HPC, and a two-stage low pressure turbine that drove the fan and booster stages. TESTS AND RESEARCH A bird’s head and wing were recovered from the runway. In addition, a U.S. Department of Agriculture Wildlife Service’s biologist later recovered bird remains from the inlet duct. The bird’s wing and the bird remains were individually submitted to the Smithsonian Institute Museum of Natural History Feather Identification Laboratory. Each sample and a photo of the recovered bird head identified the bird as a juvenile yellow-crowned night heron. According to the Smithsonian Institute Feather Identification Laboratory, juvenile yellow-crowned night herons can weigh 1 ½ to 2 pounds. The airplane’s right engine, serial number PCE-JA0103, was removed from the airplane and sent to the Pratt & Whitney Engine Services engine repair facility for examination under the supervision of a NTSB investigator. The examination revealed that although all but one of the fan blades were fractured adjacent to the root platform, there were no penetrations through the fan case. The spinner was missing from the engine, but scoring marks the approximate size and shape of the spinner were observed on the inside of the inlet duct. The metallurgical examination of the shaft, which secures the spinner, showed the fracture to be rotational bending type of fracture. The metallurgical examination of the fan blades identified several blades that had traces of the alloy used in the spinner on the surface of the blades. According to the JT15D-5 engine’s type certificate data sheet (TCDS), the engine was certified to 14 CFR Part 33 and Advisory Circular (AC) 33-1B requirements. Certification requirements in place at the time of certification stated the engine must be able to ingest a 4-pound bird, if it could enter the inlet, at climb speed with the engine at take off power. The requirements stated the engine is acceptable if it ingested the bird and “demonstrated freedom from explosion, disintegration, or uncontrollable fire.” AC-33-1B further stated that it would be acceptable if the engine required shutdown. According to PWC Engineering Report No. 1105, “JT14D-5 Certification 4 Pound Ingestion Test” the JT15D-15 engine was tested to demonstrate the ability of the JT15D-15 engine to meet the certification requirements established for large bird ingestion. According to the report, a four pound snow goose was shot at a velocity of 505 feet per second (299.2 knots) into a JT15D-5 engine that was operating at maximum cruise power. The report stated the snow goose struck the fan rotor at the outer diameter of the nose cone and the inner ends of the fan blades. All of the fan blades remained intact, but 5 of the 47 blades were noticeably bent and 13 other fan blades had the leading edge tip corner bent. The nose cone had several indentations and all 38 of the fan core stators had the tips bent and 8 of the fan core stators were severely bent. The containment case remained intact. The report concluded the test successfully demonstrated the 4 pound bird ingestion test as required by 14 CFR 33.77 (a) by not catching fire, not bursting, not exceeding the engine mount loads, or losing the ability to be shut down. 14 CFR 33.76(a)(3), subsequent to Advisory Circular (AC) 33-1B, had been changed to read “…Applicants must show that the associated components when struck under the conditions prescribed in paragraphs (b), (c) or (d) of this section, as applicable, will not affect the engine to the extent that the engine cannot comply with the requirements (b)(3), (c)(6) and (d)(4) of the section.” The engine spinner is considered an “associated component.”

Flight

Event TypeIncident
Event Time15:16 CDT
Nearest AirportSugar Land Municipal Airport (0nm)
Runway35
Runway Length8000 ft
Runway Width100 ft
Flight Plan FiledUnknown
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftRaytheon Aircraft BE-400A
Tail NumberN679SJ
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageMinor
OperatorComtran International
Operating RulePart 91
Engines2
Engine TypeTurbofan
Engine DetailsPratt & Whitney · JT15D-5 · Turbofan | Pratt & Whitney · JT15D-5 · Turbofan
Seats10

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (8 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured8
Total8
Crew 1Age 44 · First Class · None
Crew 2Age 24 · First Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind350° @ 5 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point0 C
Altimeter29.98 inHg
Observation Time19:55
Weather SourcePILO

Appendix: Source Data