Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

April 29, 2010 · Rogers Rutan Defiant 40 · N23TR

Phoenix, AZ

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
April 29, 2010
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (1 uninjured)
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Aircraft
Rogers Rutan Defiant 40
Tail Number
N23TR
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
WPR10LA219

The pilot reported that while on base leg he initiated a landing check and lowered the nose landing gear. Following initial touchdown and immediately upon placing weight on the nose gear, the nose of the airplane settled to the ground and the nose gear handle quickly popped out of the down position. During a postaccident examination of the airplane, a Federal Aviation Administration airworthiness inspector reported that the nose gear may not have been "positively" down and locked as witnessed by the alignment/witness marks. The inspector stated that when placing the gear handle down, but not “hard,” the gear indication could appear to be down and locked, but the gear could actually not be in the down and locked position. The inspector added that during the examination the gear system was operated several times. Each time if the gear handle was not placed down “firmly and hard” the alignment marks were not indicating a “SAFE” condition. The pilot further added that the mechanical alignment arrows are down by the right ankle of the pilot. In this location, an arrow misalignment is extremely difficult to perceive and the nose gear could easily be placed in "transition" vice down and locked. The pilot reported that he has since redesigned the nose gear down-and-locked indicator to be more easily viewed.

NTSB Probable Cause

The failure of the pilot to ensure that the landing gear extension handle was firmly placed in the down position prior to landing.

Full Narrative

On April 28, 2010, about 1740 mountain standard time, a Rogers Rutan Defiant 40 multi-engine airplane, N23TR, sustained substantial damage following a nose landing gear collapse during landing roll at the Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (DVT), Phoenix, Arizona. The certificated airline transport pilot, the sole occupant of the airplane, was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the personal cross-country flight, which was being operated in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91, and a flight plan was not filed. The flight departed the Ontario International Airport (ONT), Ontario, California, about 1605, with DVT as its destination. In a report submitted to the Safety Board investigator-in-charge (IIC), the pilot reported that after turning on to base leg he lowered the nose gear and initiated a “landing check.” The pilot stated that the airplane touched down about 1,000 feet down the runway at the “normal rate of descent” and with a slight left crab. The pilot reported, “following initial touchdown and immediately upon placing weight on the nose gear, the nose of the aircraft settled to the ground and the nose gear handle quickly popped out [of] the down position. The aircraft came to a stop left of centerline.” A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector assigned to the Scottsdale Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), Scottsdale, Arizona , examined the airplane and reported that its forward-mounted rudder had sustained substantial damage. On May 6, 2010, a FAA airworthiness inspector assigned to the Fresno FSDO, Fresno, California, conducted an examination of the accident airplane’s nose landing gear’s extension/retraction system. The inspector reported that it was his assessment during an evaluation of the nose landing gear operation that the gear may not have been “positively” down and locked, as witnessed by the alignment marks or witness marks for the nose landing gear. The inspector further reported that during the examination the system was operated several times, and that each time if the gear handle was not placed “down firmly and hard” the alignment marks were not indicating a “SAFE” condition. The inspector stated, “When placing the gear handle down but not hard it ‘appears’ that the nose gear could be safe and down and locked, but it’s not. Taxiing on the ground that causes any sudden bounce or bump could assist the nose gear to collapse, since it’s not positively down and locked.” The pilot further reported that the down and lock indication consisted of a mechanical alignment of arrows placed down by the right ankle of the pilot. At the conclusion of the gear swings, it was found that the nose gear could be placed in "transition" vice down and locked. He also reported that the indicator arrow misalignment is extremely difficult to perceive. The pilot has since redesigned the nose gear down and locked indicator to be more easily viewed. At 1753, about 13 minutes after the accident, the automated surface observing system located at DVT reported wind 240 degrees at 18 knots with gusts to 29 knots. Peak wind of 240 degrees at 29 knots was reported at 48 minutes passed the hour, or about 8 minutes after the accident.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time17:40 MST
Nearest AirportPhoenix Deer Valley (0nm)
Runway25L
Runway Length4508 ft
Runway Width75 ft
Flight Plan FiledNone
Aircraft FireNo

Aircraft

AircraftRogers Rutan Defiant 40
Tail NumberN23TR
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines2
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · IO-360 · Reciprocating · 200
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (1 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured1
Total1
Crew 1Age 44 · Second Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind240° @ 18 kt, gusting 29 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point39 C
Altimeter29.63 inHg
Observation Time00:53
Weather SourcePILO

Appendix: Source Data