Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

June 26, 2011 · Piper PA 46-350P · N9246M

Flagstaff, AZ

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
June 26, 2011
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (3 uninjured)
Location
Flagstaff, AZ
Aircraft
Piper PA 46-350P
Tail Number
N9246M
Operator
Karen Slakey
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
WPR11LA313

After touchdown, the airplane veered to the left when the nose gear was lowered to the runway. The pilot attempted to maintain directional control; however, the airplane continued to veer to the left and departed the runway. Examination of the airplane revealed that the nose landing gear had collapsed, and the engine mount was fractured at one of the two attachment feet for the nose landing gear actuator. Metallurgical examination of the fractured attachment foot revealed that it had failed as a result of fatigue cracking that initiated at the intersection of two welds that joined two of the engine mount’s support tubes to the right attachment foot. The fatigue cracking progressed along the toe of the weld that joined the forward support tube to the attachment foot. The location of the fatigue fracture was consistent with bending loads caused by a force directed aft by the nose gear actuator. About 9 years prior to the accident, the airframe manufacturer issued a service bulletin requiring an inspection of the engine mount attachment feet at the first regularly scheduled maintenance event after the engine mount reached 290 hours time-in-service and thereafter every 100 hours. If cracks were observed, a new engine mount must be installed. The service bulletin also states that, despite the replacement of the engine mount, the inspections should continue. As part of the inspection procedure, the paint is removed from and around the attachment feet. After the inspection is complete, the area is covered with a corrosion prevention compound. The airframe manufacturer considers performance of the service bulletin mandatory. On April 8, 2010, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued Safety Recommendation A-10-44, which asked the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to require repetitive inspections of the engine mount feet. On December 22, 2011, based on the FAA’s response that the safety risk is not sufficient to warrant issuance of an airworthiness directive to require the repetitive inspections, the NTSB classified the recommendation Closed-Unacceptable Action. Review of the airframe maintenance records indicated the airplane’s total time at its most recent inspection was about 2,238 hours, and no entries were found indicating replacement of the engine mount or compliance with the manufacturer’s issued service bulletin. Additionally, paint was observed on and around the attachment feet, which indicates that the inspection had never been performed.

NTSB Probable Cause

Fatigue failure of an engine mount attachment foot, which resulted in collapse of the nose landing gear during landing. Contributing to the accident was the failure of the owner/operator to adhere to the manufacturer's suggested engine mount inspection schedule.

Full Narrative

On June 26, 2011, about 0930 mountain standard time, a Piper PA-46-350P, N9246M, sustained substantial damage when the nose wheel landing gear collapsed during landing roll at the Flagstaff Pulliam Airport (FLG), Flagstaff, Arizona. The airplane was registered to N9246M LLC, Las Vegas, Nevada, and operated by the pilot under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The airline transport rated pilot and two passengers were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the personal flight. The cross-country flight originated from Las Vegas, Nevada, about 0810 with an intended destination of FLG. In a written statement to the National Transportation Safety Board investigator-in-charge, the pilot reported that following a normal landing on runway 21, the nose began to lower. As the nose wheel landing gear touched the runway surface, the airplane suddenly swerved to the left. Despite her control inputs, the airplane exited the left side of the runway, and the nose wheel landing gear collapsed. Subsequently, the airplane came to rest nose low about 150 feet left of the runway surface. Examination of the airplane by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed that the engine firewall was bent. Further examination of the nose gear revealed that the attachment components between the nose landing gear actuator and the engine mount were fractured. The engine mount assembly was sent to the NTSB Materials Laboratory, Washington, DC, for further examination. An NTSB metallurgist reported that the engine mount was of a welded tubular construction. The aft end of the nose landing gear actuator was bolted between two attachment feet (left and right) at the aft end of the engine mount structure. Each attachment foot was painted black, machined from a single solid piece, and welded to three support tubes. The right attachment foot was fractured in the circumferential direction inboard of the support tubes. A longitudinal fracture that extended from the circumferential fracture to the outboard end of the attachment foot was also observed. The right attachment foot was cut from the rest of the engine mount so that the fractures could be examined using an optical microscope. The longitudinal fracture was inclined at 45 degrees to the inner and outer surfaces of the tube, consistent with a ductile overstress fracture. The circumferential fracture, viewed looking generally outboard along the attachment foot, exhibited multiple cracks with smooth features and curved crack arrest marks, consistent with fatigue. The largest of these cracks initiated at the “T-shaped” intersection of two of the support tube welds. The fatigue cracks then continued to propagate along the toe of the weld that joins the forward support tubes to the attachment foot. A factual report describing the detailed examination of the engine mount components is available in the public docket. Service Bulletin / Engine Mount Design Information: Piper Aircraft Inc. Service Bulletin 1103D mandates an inspection of the left and right attachment feet for PA-46-350P Mirage serial numbers between 4622001 and 4622200 as follows: “Upon reaching 290 hours time in service on the currently installed engine mount, initial inspection to coincide with the next regularly scheduled maintenance event. Thereafter, compliance to be accomplished on a recurring basis, at a frequency interval not to exceed one hundred (100) hours time in service.” As part of the inspection procedure, the paint is removed prior to fluorescent penetrant inspection. After inspection, the area where the paint was removed is to be coated with a corrosion prevention compound consisting of a layer of Dinitrol/Ardrox AV8 and a layer of Dinitrol/Ardrox AV30. If a crack is found during the inspection, a new engine mount, part number 89137-042, is to be installed. However, the service bulletin notes that installing a new engine mount does not relieve the recurring inspection requirement. Beginning in April 2002, Piper issued a series of mandatory Service Bulletins (SB 1103, with subsequent revisions A, B, C and D) for PA-46-350P models, requiring inspections for cracks in the engine mounts in the areas of the nose landing gear actuator attachment feet. Inspections were to take place at the next regularly scheduled maintenance event, and at each 100 hours time in service or annual inspection, whichever occurred first. Review of supplied copies of airframe and engine logbooks, which were from July 20, 2007 (airframe total time of 1,965 hours) through November 4, 2010 (airframe total time of 2,237.6 hours), revealed no entries that pertained to compliance with SB1103 revisions A, B, C, or D.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time09:30 MST
Nearest AirportFlagstaff Pulliam Airport (0nm)
Runway21
Runway Length8800 ft
Runway Width150 ft
Flight Plan FiledUnknown
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftPiper PA 46-350P
Tail NumberN9246M
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
OperatorKaren Slakey
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · TIO-540 SER · Reciprocating · 310
Seats6

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (3 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured3
Total3
Crew 1Age 48 · Third Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind260° @ 17 kt, gusting 32 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point18 C
Altimeter30.18 inHg
Observation Time16:57
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data