Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

December 28, 2011 · Maule M-7-235 · N6129T

Eldorado, TX

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
December 28, 2011
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (1 uninjured)
Location
Eldorado, TX
Aircraft
Maule M-7-235
Tail Number
N6129T
Operator
Taf Aerial Services
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
CEN12CA130

As the flight neared the destination airport, the pilot obtained information from the nearest weather reporting facility, located about 33 miles away, which indicated that there would be a left crosswind component of about 15 knots with gusts to 20 knots on the landing runway. On final approach, the pilot noted that the windsock appeared to be extended at a 45 degree angle to the runway. He made his final approach with the left wing down and slightly more airspeed than usual to compensate for the crosswind. After both main wheels were on the runway, the pilot felt the left wing lift, even with full left aileron and opposite rudder inputs. He also felt that the airplane's right wheel brake was "spongy." As the wing lifted, the airplane began to ground loop to the left, skidded off the runway and impacted terrain, which resulted in substantial damage to the wings. After the pilot exited the airplane, he noted that the windsock was fully extended perpendicular to the runway. The pilot stated that he was very experienced in crosswind landings and that he should not have relied on a distant weather facility report; rather he should have made a full pattern approach to check the windsock more closely and better assess the local wind before landing. He stated that if he had been aware of how high the crosswind actually was, he would not have landed at this airport.

NTSB Probable Cause

The pilot's inadequate in-flight planning and decision-making, which resulted in a loss of control during a crosswind landing.

Full Narrative

***This report was modified on February 24, 2012. Please see the docket for this accident to view the original report.*** After checking the weather for the route of flight, the pilot initiated the aerial observation flight to survey pipelines in his tail wheel equipped airplane. The flight was uneventful and the pilot set up to land at his planned airport to refuel. Prior to making the approach to land, the pilot checked the nearest weather reporting facility (about 33 miles to the southwest). The facility reported the wind from 270 degrees at 15 knots, with gusts of 20 knots. The pilot made preparations for a crosswind landing on the runway bearing 350 degrees. On final approach, the pilot noted that the windsock appeared to be extended at a 45 degree angle to the runway. He made his final approach with the upwind wing down and a bit more airspeed than usual to compensate for the crosswind. After both main wheels were on the runway, the pilot felt the upwind wing lift, even with full left aileron and opposite rudder inputs. He also felt that the airplane's right wheel brake was "spongy." As the wing lifted, the airplane began to ground loop to the left and the pilot thought that it was too late to initiate a go-around. The airplane then skidded off the runway, impacting terrain, which resulted in substantial damage to the wings. After the pilot exited the airplane, he noted that the windsock was fully extended perpendicular to the runway. After the accident, the pilot stated that he was very experienced in crosswind landings and that he should have not relied on a distant weather facility report. He stated that he should have made a full pattern approach to check the windsock more closely and better assess the local wind before landing. He stated that if he had been aware of how high the crosswind actually was, he would not have landed at this airport.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time10:20 CST
Nearest AirportEldorado Airport (0nm)
Runway35
Runway Length4300 ft
Runway Width60 ft
Flight Plan FiledUnknown
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftMaule M-7-235
Tail NumberN6129T
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
OperatorTaf Aerial Services
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · IO-540 SER · Reciprocating · 300
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (1 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured1
Total1
Crew 1Age 57 · Second Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind270° @ 15 kt, gusting 20 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point64 F / 0 C
Altimeter0
Observation Time17:15
Weather SourcePILO

Appendix: Source Data