Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

May 26, 2012 · Cessna 150F · N7093F

San Diego, CA

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
May 26, 2012
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (2 uninjured)
Location
San Diego, CA
Aircraft
Cessna 150F
Tail Number
N7093F
Operator
Aerial Advertising
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
WPR12LA227

The pilot was performing banner tow operations over water, about 500 feet above ground level, in the modified two-seat airplane. The pilot-rated passenger was handling the airplane controls, and 1 hour after takeoff, having performed a series of uneventful laps, the pilot and passenger decided to return for landing. The passenger applied full forward throttle control to initiate a climb, but the engine lost all power. The airplane immediately began to descend, and the pilot took over the flight controls, released the banner, and performed a forced landing into the water. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage as it struck the water, separating the right main landing gear from the airframe. The separation of the right main landing gear meant that the airplane most likely came to rest right-wing-low on the sea bed. Due to the design of the fuel tanks’ interconnecting vent lines and the inclusion of a vent port on the left tank only, fuel most likely either un-ported from the left tank while in the water, or transferred between tanks after recovery. As a result, an accurate determination of the fuel tank quantities could not be determined. The pilot and passenger reported that the fuel selector valve was in the “BOTH” position throughout the flight, however it was found in the “RIGHT” tank position after the accident. The location of the valve was such that it was most likely inadvertently kicked to this position as the passenger egressed from the airplane as it was sinking. Postaccident examination did not reveal any anomalies with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation. The pilot did not use carburetor heat before the accident. While the temperature and dew point were conducive to carburetor icing at the engine’s operating power level, the investigation could not conclusively determine that carburetor ice caused the loss of engine power.

NTSB Probable Cause

A total loss of engine power while maneuvering for reasons that could not be determined because postaccident examination did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation.

Full Narrative

HISTORY OF FLIGHT On May 26, 2012, about 1530 Pacific daylight time, a Cessna 150F, N7093F, landed in the waters of San Diego Bay, San Diego, California, after experiencing a loss of engine power. Aerial Advertising LLC was operating the airplane under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91, as a banner tow flight. The commercial pilot and private pilot rated passenger were not injured. The airplane sustained substantial damage during the accident sequence. The local flight departed Gillespie Field Airport, San Diego/El Cajon about 1430. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed. With the pilot rated passenger positioned in the right seat, and taking photographs, the commercial pilot performed a series of laps in the airplane at an altitude of 500 feet agl, over the central bay area adjacent to the Coronado Bridge. The pilot then allowed the passenger to manipulate the flight controls, and they repositioned the airplane to the northeast for four more laps over the bay. Once complete, the commercial pilot verified that all engine instruments were indicating normal operation, and made contact with air traffic control personnel, requesting a clearance through the San Diego International Airport class B airspace. The passenger began to initiate a climbing right turn towards the northwest, while simultaneously applying full forward throttle. The passenger reported that the instrument panel then began to vibrate, the engine did not respond, and subsequently lost all power. The airplane immediately began to descend, and the commercial pilot took over the flight controls. He released the banner, and prepared for a forced landing into the water. Both occupants reported that they did not have time to troubleshoot, due to the low altitude. The airplane struck the water, separating the right main landing gear, and causing substantial damage to the forward fuselage and firewall. The airplane then began to sink as they egressed. AIRCRAFT INFORMATION The high wing, single engine, two seat airplane was manufactured in 1966, and had undergone a series of modifications equipping it for banner tow operations. FAA airworthiness major repair and alteration records revealed that in December 1990, the airplane was modified with the installation of a Lycoming O-360-A4A engine, installed under supplemental type certificate (STC) SA4795SW. Additional equipment included a short take off and land kit (STC SA944CE), long-range fuel tanks (STC SA5733SW), and a modification to the fuel supply system, which included the replacement of the fuel selector valve with a Cessna 172 valve, located on the seat support bulkhead under the passenger seat lip. A “Gassor Tow Hitch” assembly was installed in May 1990. The fuel tank modification included the replacement of the standard fuel tanks with two long-range tanks, the total capacity of which was 42 gallons. Fuel venting was accomplished through a ventilation hose interconnecting both tanks at their inboard walls, and a ventilation tube on the left tank outboard wall. Maintenance records indicated that the airplane had undergone an annual inspection on June 23, 2011, at a total airframe time of 6,844.38 hours. At that time, the engine (serial number RL-15969-36A) had accrued a total of 892.7 flight hours since overhaul in July 2001. Based on the tachometer time recorded on the morning of the accident flight, the engine and airframe had accumulated about 28 flight hours since annual. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION An automated surface weather observation at San Diego International Airport, (located about 1.5 miles northwest of the accident site) was issued at 1551. It indicated wind from 280 degrees at 10 knots, 10 miles visibility, with few clouds at 3,200 feet, temperature of 18 degrees C, dew point 07 degrees C, and an altimeter setting at 30.06 inches of mercury. TESTS AND RESEARCH The airplane was recovered from the sea bed on the day following the accident, and placed on the dock subsequent to transportation. Recovery personnel reported that the right tank contained fuel and water, with about 10 gallons of fuel recovered. The left tank did not contain any fuel. Examination of the fuel selector valve revealed that it was set to the right tank position. The throttle, fuel mixture, and carburetor heat controls were all in the forward position, and the flaps appeared set to about 5-degrees of extension. The pilot recounted that the standard operating procedure was to always leave the fuel selector valve in the both position during the run-up, and at all times during banner tow flights. He confirmed that the selector valve was in the both position during preflight checks, and both he and the passenger stated that it had not been changed at any time during the flight. The pilot further reported that carburetor heat was not used when the engine lost power, because it had been operating at between 2,100 and 2,300 rpm, and producing power during that period. He stated that both fuel tanks were full at the time of departure. Engine Examination The engine and airframe were examined subsequent to recovery. The engine sustained minimal damage during the accident sequence. All engine controls were continuous from their respective control arms through to the cabin controls. A blue-colored liquid consistent in color and odor to aviation gasoline was present in the gascolator and associated supply lines through to the auxiliary and engine driven fuel pumps. Residual quantities of blue fluid mixed with water were present in the hose between the engine driven fuel pump and carburetor. The inlet air filter and associated induction air lines were free of obstruction. The top spark plugs were removed, and examined. Their electrodes remained mechanically undamaged, coated in light and dark grey deposits, and displayed wear varying wear signatures between normal, and worn-out normal when compared with the Champion Spark Plugs AV-27 Check-A-Plug chart. The crankshaft turned freely when rotated by hand utilizing the propeller, and cylinder compression was noted on all cylinders. Mechanical continuity was established throughout the rotating group, valve train, and accessory section. And an audible click was heard from the magnetos consistent with impulse coupling operation. Salt water submersion and subsequent corrosion prevented an accurate determination of the magnetos’ operation. Visual inspection of the combustion chambers was accomplished through the spark plug bores utilizing a borescope; there was no evidence of foreign object damage and all combustion and exhaust surfaces exhibited light grey deposits consistent with normal operation. Examination did not reveal any anomalies with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation. The carburetor icing probability chart from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB): CE-09-35 Carburetor Icing Prevention, June 30, 2009, shows a probability of serious icing at glide power at the temperature and dew point reported at the time of the accident. Carburetor and Fuel Pump Examination The carburetor and engine driven fuel pump were removed, and examined in the presence of the NTSB investigator-in-charge, at the facilities of Corona Aircraft Engines Inc. No anomalies were noted. A full examination report is contained within the docket for this accident.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time15:30 PDT
Nearest AirportSANDIEGO (2nm)
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftCessna 150F
Tail NumberN7093F
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
OperatorAerial Advertising
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · O-360 SERIES · Reciprocating · 180
Seats2

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (2 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured2
Total2
Crew 1Age 55 · Second Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind280° @ 10 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point64 F / 45 C
Altimeter30.05 inHg
Observation Time22:51
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data