Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

July 28, 2012 · Beech A36TC · N6672X

Fayetteville, NC

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
July 28, 2012
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (3 uninjured)
Location
Fayetteville, NC
Aircraft
Beech A36TC
Tail Number
N6672X
Operator
Papa Alfa
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
ERA12LA489

While conducting a preflight inspection, the pilot observed that the right wing fuel tank was leaking at the sump on the underside of the wing. He also noted that there was no fuel in the right wing tank; however, the left wing tank contained about 33 gallons. The pilot then departed on a cross-country flight with the intention of landing at an intermediate airport that had appropriate maintenance services to have the fuel sump inspected. Upon reaching the intermediate airport, the pilot elected to continue to his original destination airport instead. While on final approach for landing at the destination airport, the engine experienced a total loss of power, and the pilot performed a forced landing to a field just short of the runway, resulting in substantial damage to the right wing. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that both left and right wing fuel tanks were intact and absent of fuel; however, fuel quantity indicators for the tanks read 1/8 and 1/4 full, respectively. Postaccident fuel consumption calculations indicated that the airplane should have consumed about 24 gallons of fuel during the accident flight, thus it is possible that there was less fuel than the pilot observed in the left tank before departure. During a test run after fuel was supplied, the engine started on the first attempt, and ran smoothly and continuously through all power settings with no anomalies observed.

NTSB Probable Cause

The pilot’s improper fuel planning, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.

Full Narrative

On July 28, 2012, approximately 1230 eastern daylight time, a Beech A36TC, N6672X, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a total loss of engine power while approaching Fayetteville Regional Airport (FAY), Fayetteville, North Carolina. The certificated private pilot and two passengers were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the flight, which departed Billy Mitchell Airport (HSE) Hatteras, North Carolina, about 1100. The personal flight was conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The pilot fueled the airplane to capacity at Dare County Regional Airport (MQI), Manteo, NC, then flew to HSE, where the airplane was parked for the next five days. He stated that his fuel consumption for the flight was 8 gallons, as both left and right fuel tanks contained 32 to 33 gallons of fuel, according to the fuel tank tabs, at the conclusion of the flight. While conducting a preflight inspection prior to departure on the day of the accident, the pilot observed that the right wing fuel tank was leaking at the sump on the underside of the wing. He removed the fuel tank cap and did not observe any fuel in the right tank. He stated that the left wing tank still contained around 32 to 33 gallons. During the preflight, the accident pilot was approached by another pilot, to whom he mentioned the leak. The second pilot, who stated that he was an airframe and powerplant mechanic, examined the fuel sump and informed the accident pilot that the fuel sump was “bad” and most likely needed to be replaced, but that there was “no problem” flying the airplane. The pilot then departed HSE for FAY, with the intention of first flying north to MQI to have the fuel sump inspected, even though MQI was not located along the route of flight from HSE to FAY. Upon reaching MQI however, the pilot elected to continue to FAY. He estimated that the airplane had burned 8 gallons of fuel during the flight from HSE, and the remaining fuel would be sufficient for the flight to FAY. The pilot stated that approximately 15 miles from FAY, the left fuel tank gauge indicated about 1/8 full, but shortly after, the gauge "shot up" to a 3/4 full indication. While on final approach for landing, at an altitude of approximately 200 feet, the engine experienced a total loss of power. The pilot switched the fuel selector to the right tank, and performed a forced landing to a field short of the runway. Postaccident examination by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed substantial damage to the right wing. The left fuel tank gauge indicated 1/8 full, while the right fuel tank gauge indicated 1/4 full. Examination of the fuel tanks revealed that both tanks were absent of fuel, and that neither tank had been breached during the forced landing. No fuel staining was observed on either wing, and when actuated, the right fuel sump operated normally. A test run of the engine was conducted on August 18, 2012 under FAA supervision. Five gallons of fuel were added to the left wing tank. The engine started on the first attempt, and ran smoothly and continuously through all power settings with no anomalies observed. The pilot held a private pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single-engine land and instrument airplane. He reported 784 total hours of flight experience, of which 23 were in the accident airplane make and model. His most recent FAA third-class medical certificate was issued in February 2011. The airplane was manufactured in 1979 and was equipped with a Continental TSIO-520, 300hp, turbo-supercharged reciprocating engine. The airplane’s most recent annual inspection was completed on May 23, 2012 at a total airframe time of 4,623 hours. The engine had accumulated 1,130 hours of operation since its most recent overhaul. The 1240 weather observation at FAY included winds from 220 degrees at 8 knots, clear skies, 10 miles visibility, temperature 31 degrees C, dew point 21 degrees C, and an altimeter setting of 29.99 inches of mercury. According to the manufacturer’s pilot’s operating handbook, at a cruise altitude of 4,000-5,000 feet, under standard atmospheric conditions, and at maximum cruise power, the airplane’s estimated fuel consumption was approximately 18 gallons per hour. At an estimated cruise speed of 160 knots, the total duration of the accident flight was estimated to be about 1.3 hours, assuming calm winds.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time12:30 EDT
Nearest AirportFayettevile Regional (1nm)
Flight Plan FiledNone
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftBeech A36TC
Tail NumberN6672X
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
OperatorPapa Alfa
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsCont Motor · TSIO-520-UB · Reciprocating · 300
Seats6

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (3 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured3
Total3
Crew 1Age 48 · Third Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind220° @ 8 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point70 F
Altimeter29.98 inHg
Observation Time16:40
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data