Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Billings, MT
After completing a personal flight, the pilot was returning to his home airport. He stated that on the first landing attempt, he was not able to maintain directional control of the airplane during the landing roll, and he aborted the landing. On the second landing attempt, he again was not able to maintain directional control and subsequently realized that there was not enough remaining runway for him to successfully abort the landing. The airplane departed the runway surface and nosed over, coming to rest inverted. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the weld that attached the tailwheel tube to the fuselage had separated. This would have allowed for the tailwheel assembly to freely move left and right without corresponding rudder input, and thus the pilot would not be able to maintain directional control during the landing roll.
The pilot’s inability to maintain directional control during the landing roll because of the failure of the tailwheel support bracket.
On December 2, 2012, at 1430 mountain standard time, an experimental exhibition AeroTek Pitts S-1T, N49309, experienced a flight control malfunction during the landing flare. The airplane landed hard on runway 28L, and departed the runway surface at the Billings Logan International Airport (BIL), Billings, Montana. After departing the runway surface, the airplane nosed over resulting in substantial damage to the tail section and the top wing. The pilot operated the airplane under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight; he was not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local area flight, and no flight plan had been filed. The pilot stated that he had taken a 40-minute flight, with no problems encountered, and returned to land at his home airport. Upon touchdown, he was not able to maintain control of the airplane, and as it moved to the left edge of the runway, he added power to abort the landing. The airplane became airborne, and he was cleared to land again on runway 28L. The airplane touched down, and the pilot again was not able to gain control of the airplane. As the airplane moved to the right edge of the runway, the pilot realized he would not be able to abort the landing. The airplane departed the runway surface, something caught in the dirt, and the airplane nosed over. The pilot reported that the weld that attached the tail wheel tube to the fuselage had separated. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector responded to the accident site. During an inspection of the airplane, he noted a broken tail wheel support bracket, which allowed the tail wheel assembly to freely move left and right without corresponding rudder input. The pilot reported to him that the support bracket failure was found when the airplane was still inverted.