Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

October 26, 2013 · Cessna 150H · N684RA

Livingston, AL

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
October 26, 2013
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (2 uninjured)
Location
Livingston, AL
Aircraft
Cessna 150H (1968)
Tail Number
N684RA
Operator
Charles E Puckett
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
ERA14LA094

After purchasing the airplane, the pilot serviced it with fuel at the self-service pump and then departed on the cross-country flight to his home airport. About 1.4 hours into the flight, he noticed the fuel quantity displayed on the fuel gauges rapidly decreasing and the electrical system "discharging." (Although the pilot reported he had been flying for 45 minutes, based on the takeoff and landing location, the airplane traveled 140 miles; the airplane's cruise speed is 100 mph; therefore, he had been flying about 1.4 hours.) The pilot chose to conduct a precautionary landing to a field. Upon landing, the nose gear dug into the soft soil, and the airplane then nosed over and came to rest inverted, which resulted in substantial damage to the engine firewall. According to the pilot, the engine was running "fine" throughout the flight, and it never stopped producing power. The pilot recovered and disassembled the airplane before reporting the accident. During recovery, he noted that one of the two 13-gallon fuel tanks was empty and that the other tank contained about 1/4 tank of fuel (about 3 to 4 gallons), which confirmed that his fuel gauges were reading accurately. After the accident, only one fuel cap was recovered from the airplane, and a similar fuel cap was recovered at the self-service pump at the departure airport. Interpolation of performance data revealed that, at a 6 gallon-per-hour fuel consumption rate, the airplane would have consumed about 8 gallons of fuel. With one fuel tank venting overboard and the engine consuming 8 gallons of fuel from the other tank, the airplane would have contained about 4 gallons of fuel at landing.

NTSB Probable Cause

The pilot's inadequate soft-field technique during the precautionary landing, which resulted in a nose-over. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's inadequate preflight inspection, which resulted in departure with an open fuel port and the subsequent in-flight, overboard venting of the fuel supply.

Full Narrative

On October 26, 2013, about 1345 central daylight time, a Cessna 150H, N684RA, was substantially damaged during a precautionary landing and subsequent nose-over near Livingston, Alabama. The two commercial pilots on board were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions (VMC) prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the personal flight, which originated from Cullman Regional Airport (CMD), Cullman, Alabama, about 1215. The flight was conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91.Following his purchase of the airplane, the pilot serviced the airplane with fuel at the self-service fuel pumps before departing to his home airport. He stated that after approximately 45 minutes of flight, he noticed that the alternator was "discharging," and that the fuel quantity displayed on the gauges was rapidly decreasing. The pilot then elected to perform a precautionary landing to a field. At touchdown, the nose landing gear dug into the soft soil and the airplane nosed over, which resulted in substantial damage to the engine firewall. When asked how the engine was performing, the pilot/owner said, "The engine was running fine…" and that it "did not quit." Sometime after the airplane departed CMD, a fuel cap similar to those installed on the accident airplane make and model was found at the self-service fuel pumps. The pilot recovered the airplane from the accident site, and transported it by truck to his home in Louisiana, but did not report the accident until January 16, 2014. During recovery, he noted that one fuel tank was empty, and the other contained about "1/4 tank" of fuel. He added, "So it's a good thing I landed when I did, because it wasn't the gauges, they were reading accurately" Photographs of the wreckage revealed a collapsed nose landing gear and substantial damage to the engine firewall. The wings were removed, and the fuel tanks had been removed from the wings. One tank had a fuel cap installed, while the other did not. The pilot and a mechanic he hired determined that the airplane had both a "bad fuel line" as well as an electrical problem. According to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and maintenance records, the airplane was manufactured in 1968. Its most recent annual inspection was completed May 18, 2013, at 7,173 total aircraft hours. The airplane was equipped with two fuel tanks, one in each wing, and each were serviced through a capped port on top of the wing. The total fuel capacity was 26 gallons, or 13 gallons per tank, of which a total of 22.5 gallons were usable. The pilot/owner held a commercial private pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single engine, multiengine, and instrument airplane. His most recent FAA third class medical certificate was issued in January, 2014. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Both fuel caps were forwarded to the NTSB Materials Laboratory in Washington, DC for examination. While similar, the caps were not identical. Examination by a materials specialist revealed that the red paint on each cap was consistent with the paint on the other. Prior to the precautionary landing, the airplane traveled approximately 140 miles in calm winds. Interpolation of performance, fuel consumption charts, and a 100 mile-per-hour cruising speed revealed an average fuel consumption rate of 6 gallons per hour. Engine start, run-up, taxi, takeoff, and initial climb were not computed.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time13:45 CDT
Nearest Airport0nm
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftCessna 150H
Tail NumberN684RA
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
OperatorCharles E Puckett
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsCont Motor · 0-200 SERIES · Reciprocating · 100
Seats2

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (2 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured2
Total2
Crew 1Age 64 · Third Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
WindCalm
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point63 F / 32 C
Altimeter30.28 inHg
Observation Time18:00

Appendix: Source Data