Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Cullman, AL
The airplane was parked on the ramp as the student pilot was preparing to conduct a local solo flight. The student reported that he primed the engine four times and opened the throttle 1/4 to 1/2 inch for starting. Once the engine was started, the airplane began to roll, and ramp surveillance video showed the airplane quickly accelerating after the engine was started before it exited from the camera's view. The student stated that the brakes were not effective and that the throttle control would not move. The airplane rolled about 344 ft from where it was parked, struck trees, and sustained substantial damage to the forward portion of the fuselage, left wing, and engine firewall. Postaccident examination of the airplane, which included a functional check of the brakes, did not reveal any preaccident malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Given the evidence, it is likely that the student was not properly applying the brakes when he started the airplane, which allowed it to move forward after the engine started.
The student pilot’s failure to maintain airplane control after engine start, which resulted in a ground collision with trees.
On January 10, 2015, about 1110 central standard time, a Cessna 152, N89921, operated by Wallace State Community College (WSCC), was substantially damaged when it impacted trees shortly after engine start, at the Cullman Regional Airport (CMD), Cullman, Alabama. The student pilot sustained minor injuries. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan had been filed for the instructional flight conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91.According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, the airplane was parked on the ramp as the student pilot prepared to conduct a local solo flight. The student pilot reported that the airplane was not equipped with a parking brake. He primed the engine four times and opened the throttle 1/4 to 1/2 inch for starting. Upon starting the engine, the airplane began to roll; however, the brakes were not effective and the throttle control would not move. The airplane continued to roll and the student pilot was able to turn enough to avoid hitting a hangar. The airplane rolled approximately 344 feet from where it was parked, struck trees and sustained substantial damage to the forward portion of the fuselage, left wing, and engine firewall. Postaccident examination of the airplane by FAA inspectors was performed on January 15, 2015. The examination included a functional check of the brakes, and did not reveal any preaccident malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Both the throttle and mixture controls were impact damaged and could not be moved; however, they remained properly connected. It was noted that the airplane was equipped with a parking brake; however, it was ineffective due to a loose cable. School flight instructors reported that they did not teach students to utilize the parking brake during engine start because they did not want the students to rely on the parking brake and preferred to emphasize regular brake usage during engine starts. An FAA inspector further reported that ramp surveillance video showed the airplane quickly accelerating after the engine was started before it exited from camera view. According to maintenance records, the airplane had been operated about 6 hours since its most recent annual inspection, which was performed about 30 days prior to the accident. The airplane was last flown by the student pilot about 1 week prior to the accident without incident. The student pilot reported about 24 hours of total flight experience, which included 2 hours logged as pilot-in-command.