Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

May 14, 2015 · Aviat Pitts S-2B · N110PS

Tullahoma, TN

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
May 14, 2015
Injury Outcomes
1 injury (1 serious injury), 1 uninjured
Location
Tullahoma, TN
Aircraft
Aviat Pitts S-2B (1996)
Tail Number
N110PS
Operator
Hartvigsen Thomas E
Injuries
Serious
Aircraft Damage
Minor
NTSB Number
ERA15LA210

A red V Star biplane and a white Aviat Pitts biplane collided while both airplanes were landing on the same runway. Review of both pilot statements, a witness statement, and a video from a recorder attached to the white biplane pilot's helmet revealed that the red biplane was ahead of the white biplane in the left airport traffic pattern. Both pilots reported their positions on the common traffic advisory frequency; the white biplane pilot reported when he entered the downwind and final legs, and the red biplane pilot reported when he was 7 miles inbound and when he entered the downwind leg. A review of the video showed that, for a 7-second period just before and as the white biplane was turning onto the base leg, the red biplane was visible as a small, dull, white flashing dot above trees on a flightpath consistent with entering the final leg. The red biplane then disappeared behind the white biplane's upper wing but then reappeared for 4 more seconds while the white biplane was on the left base leg. The red biplane then moved from left of the white biplane's nose and just below the upper wing to centered just above the nose. The red biplane then disappeared below the white biplane's cowling until 1 second before impact. The white biplane was faster than the red biplane, flew a closer traffic pattern, and turned onto the base leg sooner, which resulted in the white biplane overtaking the red biplane and landing on top of it as the red biplane touched down on the runway.

NTSB Probable Cause

The other pilot’s inadequate visual lookout, which resulted in his airplane landing on top of this airplane.

Full Narrative

On May 13, 2015, about 1930 central daylight time, an Aviat Pitts S-2B, N110PS, and an experimental amateur-built V STAR, N675GM, collided while landing on runway 36 at Tullahoma Regional Airport (THA), Tullahoma, Tennessee. The Pitts sustained minor damage and the V STAR was substantially damaged. The private pilot of the Pitts was not injured and the private pilot of the V STAR was seriously injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plans were filed for the local flights. The personal flights were conducted under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91.The pilot of the Pitts stated that he was about 2.5 miles southeast of runway 36, at 2,500 feet mean sea level, when he switched his radio frequency from the THA automated weather observation system to the common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF). While setting up for a 45-degree entry into the airport traffic pattern, the pilot of the Pitts heard a radio transmission from another airport and then announced his position on the entry to the airport traffic pattern. While on a downwind leg of the airport traffic pattern, the pilot of the Pitts subsequently heard another radio transmission that another airplane was approaching THA and would be following the Pitts. He then heard a faint radio transmission that there was a red biplane on the runway, but no airport was associated with the transmission. He looked for a red biplane and did not see any airplanes on runway 36. The pilot of the Pitts continued his approach and again did not see any airplanes while on final approach. After crossing the runway threshold, the pilot of the Pitts heard a "bang" and felt a sudden deceleration. He did not know what happened until the airplane came to a stop, at which time he realized he had collided with another airplane. The pilot of the Pitts had a GoPro HERO 3 video recorder attached to his helmet. A copy of the accident video was forwarded to the NTSB Vehicle Recorder Laboratory, Washington, D.C., for further examination. The pilot of the V STAR reported that he entered the downwind leg of the airport traffic pattern for runway 36 and announced his position on the CTAF using the callsign "red biplane." As the V STAR then turned from base to final leg, the pilot announced his position on the final leg of the airport traffic pattern. The V Star touched down normally and was then impacted by the Pitts. A witness, who was a flight instructor in a third airplane, reported that at the time of the collision he was flying in the traffic pattern with a student. The witness further stated that between utilizing only a handheld radio and the distraction of teaching a student, he couldn't hear radio transmissions very well. He did recall that the Pitts pilot made an announcement that he was 7 miles out and would be entering the traffic pattern on a 45-degree entry to the downwind leg for runway 36. The witness added that the V STAR pilot had been doing touch-and-go landings on runway 36 and remaining in the traffic pattern. Although the V STAR flew a downwind, base, and final leg for runway 36, the witness only heard the V STAR pilot announce via radio that he was a half-mile final for runway 36. However, it was possible that both pilots made more radio transmissions and he did not hear them. The witness added that he extended his crosswind leg to allow the Pitts to go ahead of him as he knew the Pitts was faster than his airplane. The Pitts was also faster than the V STAR and turned a base leg sooner than the V STAR, which resulted in the Pitts overtaking the V STAR upon landing. Review of the video revealed that it was 7 minutes, 58 seconds long. About 3 minutes, 30 seconds elapsed time (ET), the Pitts pilot began a right turn and intercepted a path consistent with a 45-degree entry to the left downwind leg of the airport traffic pattern for runway 36. About 4 minutes, 14 seconds ET, the Pitts completed a right turn and was on the left downwind leg for runway 36. About 4 minutes, 23 seconds ET, the V Star was visible on a flight path consistent with a final leg to runway 36. The V Star appeared as a small dull white flashing dot in the vicinity of a tree line intersecting a field from the Pitts pilot's perspective. During this time, the point of view of the camera was oscillating, consistent with the Pitts pilot looking in different directions. About 4 minutes, 29 seconds ET, which was 2 seconds after the Pitts was abeam the runway 36 numbers, the Pitts began a descending left turn. At this point, the V Star appeared as a small dot above the trees. The V Star disappeared behind the Pitts' upper wing, but then reappeared at 4 minutes, 35 seconds ET, left of the nose and just below the upper wing of the Pitts. At 4 minutes, 38 seconds, the V Star was centered just above the nose of the Pitts, which was the last moment, until impact, that the V Star was visible on the recording. At 5 minutes, 3 seconds ET, the red and white upper wing of the V Star was visible just below and to the left of the nose of the Pitts, which was 1 second before impact (for more information, see Onboard Image Recorder Specialist's Factual Report in the NTSB public docket). The weather at THA, at 1935, included calm wind, clear sky, and visibility 10 miles.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time19:30 CDT
Nearest AirportTullahoma Regional Airport (0nm N)
Runway36
Runway Length5002 ft
Runway Width100 ft
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftAviat Pitts S-2B
Tail NumberN110PS
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageMinor
OperatorHartvigsen Thomas E
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · AEIO-540 · Reciprocating · 260 | Lycoming · O-290 · Reciprocating · 125
Seats2

People & Injuries

Injury Summary1 injury (1 serious injury), 1 uninjured
Fatal0
Serious1
Minor0
Uninjured1
Total2
Crew 1Age 62 · Third Class · None
Crew 2Age 63 · Sprt · Serious

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
WindCalm
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point70 F / 36 C
Altimeter30.23 inHg
Observation Time00:35
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data