Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

October 26, 2018 · Piper PA28 140 · N5575U

Parker, CO

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
October 26, 2018
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (2 uninjured)
Location
Parker, CO
Aircraft
Piper PA28 140 (1969)
Tail Number
N5575U
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
ERA19LA027

After completing the preflight inspection, the pilot reported a normal engine runup and recalled checking the carburetor heat and magnetos twice before takeoff. He started the takeoff roll and noticed that the roll was a "little longer than normal” and that the airplane’s climb performance was poor. He applied carburetor heat, noted a loss of rpm, then turned the carburetor heat off. Shortly thereafter, the airplane started to descend, and the pilot performed a forced landing to a field. Examination of the engine revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The atmospheric conditions at the time of the accident were conducive to the formation of serious carburetor icing at cruise power settings. Since postaccident examination of the engine revealed no anomalies, it is likely that the loss of power was a result of carburetor ice accumulation. It is possible that carburetor ice formed before departure, when the engine was operating at a low power setting, which resulted in a partial loss of engine power during the initial climb.

NTSB Probable Cause

A partial loss of engine power during initial climb due to carburetor icing, and the pilot's failure to effectively use carburetor heat in conditions conducive to the formation of carburetor ice.

Full Narrative

On October 26, 2018, about 0730 mountain daylight time, a Piper PA-28, N5575U, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Denver, Colorado. The commercial pilot and pilot-rated passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot stated that he completed the preflight inspection, started the engine on the left fuel tank, then switched to the right fuel tank during taxi to the runup area. He reported a normal engine runup and recalled checking the carburetor heat and magnetos twice. He received a weather briefing, opened his flight plan, and was cleared to take off from runway 17L. He started the takeoff roll and noticed that the roll was a "little longer than normal," but attributed it to the weight of the airplane’s full fuel tanks and the passenger. During the initial climb, the airplane was climbing at 400 to 500 ft per minute. He then noticed that the climb rate was deteriorating and that the stall warning light was flashing intermittently. He pitched down, verified that the throttle was in the full power position and that the fuel/air mixture was full rich, then applied carburetor heat and retracted the flaps. He noticed a decrease in rpm after applying carburetor heat, concluded that carburetor ice was not a factor based on “no engine roughness” before turning on carburetor heat and the atmospheric conditions, and subsequently turned the carburetor heat off. The airplane’s climb performance continued to degrade; shortly thereafter, the airplane began to descend, and the pilot performed a forced landing to a field. During the landing, the engine "seemed to lose power," then briefly surged just before touchdown. A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector who responded to the accident site reported the airplane came to rest upright 2 miles and 195° from the departure end of runway 17L. The airplane remained intact; however, the nose and main landing gear were separated from the fuselage, the right wing leading edge was damaged, and the empennage skin was wrinkled. One propeller blade exhibited aft bending and chordwise scratching. The inspector noted the presence of fuel in both wing tanks. The engine crankshaft was rotated by hand, and internal and valvetrain continuity was established. Fuel was present throughout the fuel lines and was absent of any water and debris. The fuel gascolator was dry and the gascolator screen was free of debris and contamination. Power was applied to the electric fuel pump and it functioned normally. The engine-driven fuel pump was actuated by turning the propeller and it functioned normally. Both magnetos produced spark at all towers. There was no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal engine operation. The 0653 weather reported at APA included a temperature of 3°C and a dew point of -3°C. The calculated relative humidity was about 66.8%. According to an FAA Carburetor Icing Probability Chart, the atmospheric conditions at the time of the accident were conducive to serious icing at cruise power settings. FAA Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (CE-09-35) – Carburetor Icing Prevention, stated that: …pilots should be aware that carburetor icing doesn't just occur in freezing conditions, it can occur at temperatures well above freezing temperatures when there is visible moisture or high humidity. Icing can occur in the carburetor at temperatures above freezing because vaporization of fuel, combined with the expansion of air as it flows through the carburetor, (Venturi Effect) causes sudden cooling, sometimes by a significant amount within a fraction of a second. Carburetor ice can be detected by a drop in rpm in fixed pitch propeller airplanes and a drop in manifold pressure in constant speed propeller airplanes. In both types, usually there will be a roughness in engine operation.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time07:30 MDT
Nearest AirportCentennial (2nm SSW)
Runway17L
Runway Length10001 ft
Runway Width100 ft
Flight Plan FiledVFR
Flight Plan ActivatedYes
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftPiper PA28 140
Tail NumberN5575U
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · O-320-E2A · Reciprocating · 150
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (2 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured2
Total2
Crew 1Age 40 · Third Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind120° @ 3 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point37 C / 27 C
Altimeter30.11 inHg
Observation Time12:53
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data