Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

July 24, 2021 · Cessna 150F · N7893F

Rock Falls, IL

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
July 24, 2021
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (2 uninjured)
Location
Rock Falls, IL
Aircraft
Cessna 150F (1966)
Tail Number
N7893F
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
CEN21LA335

The airplane owner and the other pilot met each other at an aviation event just before the accident flight. After a short discussion, the two pilots decided to conduct a local flight in the accident airplane. After takeoff, while on the downwind leg of the traffic pattern, the right seat pilot (non-owner) asked to take the airplane’s controls from the owner (seated in the left seat), and a positive exchange of controls was accomplished. The right seat pilot then flew a low approach over a temporary grass runway with 40° of flaps extended. The right seat pilot did not intend to land; instead, he performed a go-around about 100 ft above the ground with full engine power and carburetor heat in the OFF position. The right seat pilot then attempted to retract the flaps, and he reported the flaps would not retract. The left seat pilot attempted to cycle the flap switch and was unsuccessful in retracting the flaps. Unable to maintain altitude, the right seat pilot performed an off airport landing to a corn field. The airplane impacted the corn field, flipped over, and came to rest inverted. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the engine firewall and engine mount. Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine, which included testing of the flap system, revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. A four-port universal serial bus (USB) power supply adapter was found plugged into a power port located just below the cockpit flap switch. It was undetermined if the adapter conflicted with the operation of the flap switch. Based on available evidence, a reason for the reported flap issue was not determined.

NTSB Probable Cause

The right seat pilot’s improper decision to perform a low approach with full flaps and the failure of the flaps to retract during the attempted go-around, which resulted in a forced landing.

Full Narrative

On July 24, 2021, about 1830 central daylight time, a Cessna 150F, N7893F, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Rock Falls, Illinois. The two pilots were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. According to the airplane owner, he and the other pilot met each other at an aviation event just before the accident flight. After a short discussion, the two pilots decided to conduct a local flight in the accident airplane. The owner, who was seated in the left seat, stated that the airplane’s engine needed to be hand-propped due to a starter that “wasn’t very powerful.” After the engine start-up, the pilots monitored the airplane’s electrical system and performed an engine run-up with no issues noted. After takeoff, while on the downwind leg of the traffic pattern, the right seat pilot asked to take the airplane’s controls from the left seat pilot, and a positive exchange of controls was accomplished. The right seat pilot then flew a low approach over a temporary grass runway with 40° of flaps extended. The right seat pilot did not intend to land and performed a go-around about 100 ft above the ground with full engine power and carburetor heat in the OFF position. The right seat pilot then attempted to retract the flaps; however, the flaps would not retract. The left seat pilot attempted to cycle the flap switch and was unsuccessful in retracting the flaps. Unable to maintain altitude, the right seat pilot performed an off airport landing to a corn field. The airplane impacted the corn field, flipped over, and came to rest inverted. According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector, the airplane sustained substantial damage to the engine firewall and engine mount. The inspector also noted a four-port USB power supply adapter was plugged into a power port just below the flap switch (see figure 1). Figure 1. Instrument Panel (photograph provided by the FAA) A review of the airplane logbooks revealed that the airplane had been disassembled, inspected, and reassembled; all work was completed on July 1, 2014. Part of the aircraft reassembly included the replacement of the instrument panel and some aircraft wiring. The flap switch was relocated from its original position and was also changed to a new flap switch design. A circuit breaker had been installed in the flap wiring, which replaced the original fuse. A cigarette style power port was installed below the flap handle. The total tachometer time from the July 2014 maintenance to the accident was about 150 hours. Postaccident examination of the airplane was conducted by a FAA inspector and a representative of Textron Aviation. The examination revealed that the flaps were in the full-down or 40° extended position. The airplane battery was connected (disconnected for recovery purposes) and the master switch was turned on. The flap system was tested multiple times, flaps retracted and extended with cockpit flap switch, and no anomalies were noted with the function of the flap system. No visual abnormalities were noted during the examination of the flap wiring. The wiring in the wing was manipulated by hand during the flap extension and retraction cycles, and no problems were noted. The flap circuit breaker was pulled during a flap cycle, and the flap movement stopped. When the circuit breaker was reset, the flaps began to operate. At some point after the FAA’s initial examination of the airplane, the four-port USB power supply adapter had been removed from the power port and was located in the aft baggage area. According to the Cessna’s Owner’s Manual, Section 2, Flap Settings, “Normal and obstacle clearance take-offs are performed with flaps up…flap deflections of 30° and 40° are not recommended at any time for take-off…In a balked landing (go-around) climb, the wing flap setting should be reduced to 20° immediately after full power is applied. Upon reaching a safe airspeed, the flaps should be slowly retracted to the full up position.” Multiple requests to obtain a completed National Transportation Safety Board Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident/Incident form and a statement from the right seat pilot were unsuccessful.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time18:30 CDT
Nearest Airport0nm
Flight Plan FiledNone
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftCessna 150F
Tail NumberN7893F
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsCont Motor · 0-200A · Reciprocating · 100
Seats2

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (2 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured2
Total2
Crew 1Age 60 · First Class · None
Crew 2Age 42 · Third Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind290° @ 13 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Altimeter29.85 inHg
Observation Time17:56
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data