Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

August 25, 2021 · Acro Sport II NO Series · N169BF

Fishers, IN

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
August 25, 2021
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (1 uninjured)
Location
Fishers, IN
Aircraft
Acro Sport II NO Series (1995)
Tail Number
N169BF
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
CEN21LA386

The pilot was conducting a post-maintenance flight in the experimental airplane to “break-in” two engine cylinders that were replaced on the day before the accident. The engine was operated at maximum speed with a full rich mixture setting throughout the flight. The pilot stated that the airplane lost total engine power about 1 hour after takeoff. During the forced landing, the airplane impacted a street signpost, resulting in substantial damage to a structural fuselage tube. The pilot reported that the fuel tank contained 23 gallons of fuel at the start of the flight. Postaccident examination found that the airplane’s fuel tank was empty and that only 2 to 3 fluid ounces of fuel were recovered from the fuel system. Evidence of a fuel leak was found within the engine compartment and on the exterior lower fuselage skins aft of the firewall. Examination of the fuel system revealed that the fuel inlet fitting to the fuel control unit was finger tight. In preparation for a postaccident engine test, the loose fuel inlet fitting was tightened, and the fuel system was pressurized to confirm that no other leak sources existed. The engine started and ran normally without any hesitation, stumbling, or interruption in power. There was no evidence of a fuel system leak following the engine run. Based on data collected during the engine test, the fuel consumption rate at maximum engine power on the ground (static power) was about 13.69 gallons per hour (gph) at an engine speed of 2,260 rpm. The estimated fuel consumption rate while in flight at maximum engine power (2,800 rpm) was about 16.96 gph. With a full fuel tank (23 gallons) at departure, the airplane’s fuel endurance was about 1 hour 21 minutes if the engine was operated at maximum power with a full rich mixture setting. Other than the loose fuel inlet fitting, the engine examination and test run revealed no mechanical malfunctions that would have prevented normal engine operation during the flight. Air traffic control radar data showed that the airplane was airborne for about 1 hour 15 minutes during the accident flight. Thus, it is likely that the loose fuel inlet fitting leaked fuel during the flight, which resulted in fuel exhaustion and the subsequent total loss of engine power.

NTSB Probable Cause

The airplane’s total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion as a result of leaking fuel from a loose fuel inlet fitting to the fuel control unit.

Full Narrative

HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn August 25, 2021, about 1822 eastern daylight time, an Acro Sport II experimental airplane, N169BF, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Fishers, Indiana. The pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that the purpose of the flight was to “break-in” two engine cylinders that were replaced on the day before the accident. According to the pilot’s statement and fueling documentation, the airplane’s 23-gallon fuel tank was topped off before the flight. The pilot reported that the engine was operated at maximum speed (2,800 rpm) with a full rich mixture setting throughout the flight and that the airplane lost total engine power about 1 hour after takeoff. During the forced landing, the forward right side of the fuselage impacted a street signpost, resulting in substantial damage to a structural tube in the fuselage. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe experimental biplane was designed for aerobatic flight, and its engine was modified with oversized cylinders and pistons. The engine had no data plate or serial number. During the airplane’s last condition inspection, the tachometer was reset to 0 hours. At that time, the airframe total time and engine time since overhaul were 641 and 60 hours, respectively. On August 24, 2021, cylinder Nos. 3 and 4 were replaced after being refurbished due to low compression. The mechanic, who was also the pilot/owner, reported no issues during his engine runup after the cylinder replacements. At that time, the airframe total time and engine time since overhaul were 669 and 88 hours, respectively. Air traffic control radar track data showed that the pilot flew the airplane about 1 hour 15 minutes (1.25 hours) during the accident flight. Thus, at the time of the accident, the airframe total time and engine time since overhaul would have been 670 and 89 hours, respectively. AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe experimental biplane was designed for aerobatic flight, and its engine was modified with oversized cylinders and pistons. The engine had no data plate or serial number. During the airplane’s last condition inspection, the tachometer was reset to 0 hours. At that time, the airframe total time and engine time since overhaul were 641 and 60 hours, respectively. On August 24, 2021, cylinder Nos. 3 and 4 were replaced after being refurbished due to low compression. The mechanic, who was also the pilot/owner, reported no issues during his engine runup after the cylinder replacements. At that time, the airframe total time and engine time since overhaul were 669 and 88 hours, respectively. Air traffic control radar track data showed that the pilot flew the airplane about 1 hour 15 minutes (1.25 hours) during the accident flight. Thus, at the time of the accident, the airframe total time and engine time since overhaul would have been 670 and 89 hours, respectively. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONPostaccident examination of the airplane found that its fuel tank was empty, with 2 to 3 fluid ounces of fuel recovered when the fuel system was drained during the examination. Evidence of a fuel leak was found within the engine compartment and on the exterior lower fuselage skins aft of the firewall. This evidence included areas of fuel pooling, droplets of fuel dripping from control cable clamps, a fuel sheen on the firewall, and fuel streaking on the exterior lower fuselage skins aft of the firewall. Engine control continuity was confirmed from the cockpit controls to the throttle arm and mixture control at the fuel servo. The fuel inlet fitting to the fuel control unit was finger tight. In preparation for an engine test the loose fuel inlet fitting was tightened (to determine the fuel consumption at the maximum static engine rpm), and the fuel system was pressurized at least twice, which confirmed that no other leak sources existed. During the test, the engine started and ran normally without any hesitation, stumbling, or interruption in power. No evidence of a fuel system leak was found after the engine run. The fuel consumption rate at maximum engine power on the ground (static power) was about 13.69 gallons per hour at 2,260 rpm. On the basis of the engine test run results, the estimated fuel consumption rate while in flight at maximum engine power (2,800 rpm) was about 16.96 gallons per hour. With a full fuel tank (23 gallons) at departure, the airplane’s fuel endurance would have been about 1 hour 21 minutes (1.35 hours) if the engine was operated at maximum power with a full rich mixture setting. Other than the loose fuel inlet fitting, the engine examination and test run revealed no mechanical malfunctions that would have prevented normal engine operation during the flight.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time18:22 EDT
Nearest AirportIndianapolis Metro Airport (1.8nm ESE)
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftAcro Sport II NO Series
Tail NumberN169BF
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming (Experimental) · IO-360 · Reciprocating · 205
Seats2

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (1 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured1
Total1
Crew 1Age 46 · First Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind200° @ 3 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Altimeter30.12 inHg
Observation Time18:15
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data