Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Rogers City, MI
The noncertificated pilot was departing on a local flight. The pilot reported that about 100 ft into the takeoff roll the airplane began to swerve right, but before he could abort the takeoff, he heard a bang and the airplane pitched up and rolled. A witness reported that the airplane abruptly pitched up, rolled right, and impacted the ground in a left-wing-down attitude. The witness stated that the airplane completed about 270° of right roll when the left wing impacted the ground. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left wing, fuselage, tailboom, and left horizontal stabilizer. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the right wing’s forward lift strut separated from the fuselage longeron. The channel bracket remained attached to the lift strut, but the attachment bolt pulled out of the fuselage longeron. The nylon-insert lock nut that normally secured the attachment bolt to the fuselage longeron was not located during the investigation. Flight control continuity was confirmed from the cockpit controls to each flight control surface. The pilot did not maintain maintenance records for the airplane, nor had the airplane undergone a condition inspection since the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued the experimental airworthiness certificate in December, 2007.
The separation of the right wing’s forward lift strut from the fuselage due to a missing nylon-insert lock nut. Contributing to the accident was the noncertificated pilot’s decision to operate the airplane even though a condition inspection had not been completed in the 13 years since the airplane received its experimental airworthiness certificate.
HISTORY OF FLIGHTOn September 11, 2021, about 0745 eastern daylight time, a Quad City Ultralight Challenger II experimental airplane, N778H, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Rogers City, Michigan. The pilot sustained minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 personal flight. The noncertificated pilot reported that about 100 ft into the takeoff roll on runway 27 the airplane began to swerve right, but before he could abort the takeoff, he heard a bang and the airplane pitched up and rolled. A witness reported that the airplane abruptly pitched up, rolled right, and impacted the ground in a left-wing-down attitude. The witness stated that the airplane completed about 270° of right roll when the left wing impacted the ground. PERSONNEL INFORMATIONA search of FAA airman certification records found no record of a pilot certificate ever being issued to the pilot. The pilot reported that he had previous flying experience in 14 CFR Part 103 ultralights. AIRCRAFT INFORMATIONThe pilot did not maintain maintenance records for the airplane, nor had the airplane undergone a condition inspection since the FAA issued the experimental airworthiness certificate on December 14, 2007. AIRPORT INFORMATIONThe pilot did not maintain maintenance records for the airplane, nor had the airplane undergone a condition inspection since the FAA issued the experimental airworthiness certificate on December 14, 2007. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATIONPostaccident examination revealed substantial damage to the airplane’s left wing, fuselage, tailboom, and left horizontal stabilizer. Flight control continuity was confirmed from the cockpit controls to each flight control surface. Further examination of the right wing revealed that the forward lift strut separated from the fuselage longeron, as shown in figure 1. The channel bracket remained attached to the lift strut, but the AN4-24A bolt pulled out of the fuselage longeron. The 0.25-inch AN365-248 nylon-insert lock nut, depicted in figure 2, that normally secured the AN4-24A bolt was not located during the investigation. Figure 1. Lower attachment point of the right wing forward lift strut (FAA photos). Figure 2. Wing lift strut assembly, lower attachment.