Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

August 9, 2022 · Piper PA-32-300 · N841AD

Corona, CA

Overview

Report Status
Final with probable cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
August 9, 2022
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (2 uninjured)
Location
Corona, CA
Aircraft
Piper PA-32-300 (1973)
Tail Number
N841AD
Operator
Cedar Real Estate
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
WPR22LA296

The pilot reported that the engine lost partial power when he adjusted the engine power while entering the downwind leg of the traffic pattern. The engine did not respond, so he cycled the throttle several times with no change. Unable to maintain altitude, he initiated a forced landing onto a freeway, during which the airplane impacted a freeway barrier and a postaccident fire ensued that resulted in substantial damage. The pilot further reported that he did not believe he turned on the auxiliary fuel pump switch before the accident. Examination of the airframe and engine revealed that the fuel supply line from the engine driven fuel pump to the fuel servo had a torsional twist near the engine driven fuel pump outlet port. The engine-driven fuel pump was removed and exhibited signatures consistent with a preexisting fuel leak at the case split, along with corrosion to the input drive seal area. The pump was tested utilizing a test bench, the fuel pump output pressure was found to be within manufacturer limits despite the preexisting leak and likely did not contribute to a loss of engine power. It could not be determined how much the kinked fuel line restricted the fuel flow to the fuel servo. Downloaded engine monitoring data showed that fuel flow was within the manufacturers specified limits, thus it’s likely that the twisted fuel line did not contribute to the loss of engine power. The loss of engine power could not be determined due to the available evidence.

NTSB Probable Cause

The airplane’s partial loss of engine power during the landing for reasons that could not be determined based on the available evidence, which resulted in an off airport landing and subsequent fire.

Full Narrative

On August 9, 2022, about 1231 Pacific daylight time, a Piper, PA-32-300, N841AD, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Corona, California. The pilot and passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The flight departed Corona Municipal Airport (AJO) about 1115 for a local flight. The pilot reported that they were returning to AJO when he adjusted the engine power to level off and reduce airspeed while entering the downwind leg of the traffic. He stated that the engine did not respond, and he cycled the throttle several times with no change. The airplane was unable to maintain altitude and the pilot elected to make a forced landing onto the eastbound lanes of US Highway91. During the landing flare, to prevent the airplane from impacting a car, the pilot intentionally stalled the airplane. The airplane landed hard, rotated to the right (clockwise), and impacted a freeway barrier. He and the passenger exited the airplane and a postaccident fire ensued. The pilot reported that he normally verifies that the auxiliary fuel pump selector switch is in the on position before entering the downwind leg of the traffic pattern, when he completes a pre-landing checklist. He said he did not think he turned on the fuel boost pump switch as he entered the traffic pattern because he was responding to the loss of engine power and finding a suitable area for an emergency landing. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the cockpit and fuselage was mostly destroyed by thermal and impact damage. Throttle and mixture control continuity was established from the cockpit controls to the fuel servo and moved from stop to stop when actuated by hand. A visual inspection of the fuel system established continuity from the wing roots to the fuel injectors. Various breaks in the wing fuel lines were observed in both wings, consistent with cuts by recovery personnel and/or impact damage. A torsional twist (kink) in the steel braided fuel supply output line from the engine driven fuel pump to the fuel servo was observed. There was no visible impact damage to the airframe that would account for the torsional twist in the fuel line. The position of the auxiliary fuel pump switch could not be determined due to fire damage. A subsequent examination of the engine driven fuel pump revealed evidence of a preexisting fuel leak at the case split, along with corrosion to the input drive seal area. The fuel pump was connected to a test stand and the pump was able to maintain and exceed output fuel pressure at idle and high speeds. Furthermore, the pump was found to be within limits when the kinked output fuel line was installed; however, as the fuel line B-nuts were progressively torqued utilizing a hand tool, the pump pressure decreased until it was no longer able to maintain adequate output pressure. The airplane was equipped with a J. P. Instruments EDM-830 engine monitor. The engine monitor was removed at sent to the National Transportation Safety Board Vehicle Recorder Laboratory. Examination of the engine monitor revealed heat and fire damaged to the exterior of the unit. The non-volatile memory chip was removed, installed on a functional lab surrogate unit, and data were downloaded normally using the manufacturer’s procedures. The recorded time and the time displayed is from 17:25:00 to 19:30:00. Throughout the recorded data, changes in engine rpm, fuel flow, manifold pressure, horsepower, oil pressure and oil temperature were observed consistent with takeoff, climbs, and descent power settings. At about 19:22 a reduction of manifold pressure, engine rpm and fuel flow were observed. The data shows that at 19:23:36 the fuel flow indicated from 24.4 gallons an hour, the manifold pressure indicated 26.4 and the engine rpm indicated 2502. The subsequent data showed the manifold pressure increased to 30.1, a decrease in engine rpm to 80 and fuel flow variation from 0 gallons an hour to 3.2 gallons an hour. A review of the airplane’s maintenance records showed that the fuel servo had been replaced on February 20, 2019, and did not reveal if any subsequent maintenance had been performed on the engine-driven fuel pump or kinked fuel line. Figure: View of fuel line without the protective outer cover

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time12:31 PDT
Nearest AirportCorona Muni (2nm N)
Runway25
Runway Length3200 ft
Runway Width60 ft
Flight Plan FiledNone
Aircraft FireGrd
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftPiper PA-32-300
Tail NumberN841AD
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
OperatorCedar Real Estate
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsLycoming · TIO-540 · Reciprocating · 300
Seats6

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (2 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured2
Total2
Crew 1None
Crew 2Age 54 · Basc · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind280° @ 10 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point55 F
Altimeter29.92 inHg
Observation Time12:56
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data