Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Manchester, MI
According to the flight instructor, the airplane was in cruise flight when the engine rpm dropped from about 2,400 to about 1,300. He took the flight controls from the student pilot, turned on carburetor heat, and used the checklist in an attempt to restore power. According to the flight instructor, while trying different throttle and mixture settings, the rpm increased to about 1,500 for about 10 seconds before reducing back to 1,300. According to the student pilot, after the engine rpm reduced to 1,300, the flight instructor applied carburetor heat, and the engine rpm reduced and then increased briefly. The instructor notified air traffic control of the power loss and diverted to the nearest airport. When he realized they would not be able to reach the airport, he selected a field for a forced landing. During the landing, the nosewheel dug into the soft soil, and the airplane flipped over, which resulted in substantial damage to the vertical stabilizer and rudder. A postaccident examination of the engine and airframe revealed no mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Based on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) carburetor icing probability chart, the atmospheric conditions at the time of the accident were conducive to the development of serious carburetor icing at glide and cruise power. Therefore, it is likely that the loss of engine power was due to the formation of carburetor ice. Although the engine power increased briefly when the flight instructor applied carburetor heat, it is likely the amount of ice was too much for the carburetor heat to overcome.
Environmental issues-Conditions/weather/phenomena-Temp/humidity/pressure-Conducive to carburetor icing-Effect on equipment
On November 13, 2022, about 0950 central standard time, a Cessna 152 airplane, N222UM, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident near Manchester, Michigan. The flight instructor and the student pilot were uninjured. The flight was being operated as a 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight. The flight instructor stated that they had been in cruise flight with the engine operating about 2,400 rpm when he “felt the power drop.” He then noticed the tachometer showed about 1,300 rpm. He stated that he took the flight controls from the student pilot, applied carburetor heat, and used the checklist to attempt to restore power. At one point, while trying different throttle and mixture settings, the rpm appeared to increase to about 1,500 for about 10 seconds before reducing back to 1,300. The instructor notified air traffic control of the power loss and diverted to the nearest airport. When it became evident they would not be able to reach the airport, he selected a field for a forced landing. During the landing, the nose wheel dug into the soft soil, and the airplane nosed over, which resulted in substantial damage to the vertical stabilizer and rudder. The student pilot stated that after the engine rpm reduced to 1,300, the flight instructor applied carburetor heat, and the engine rpm reduced and then “came back up” but only for a short time. Both pilots stated that the fuel tanks had been topped off the night before, and the airplane was placed in a hangar overnight. Before the flight, they conducted a preflight inspection, which included sumping the fuel tanks, with no anomalies noted. After engine start and taxi, a run-up was accomplished with no anomalies noted. During a postaccident examination, control continuity was established from the cockpit to all flight and engine controls. Fuel was drained from the carburetor and the left and right fuel tanks, and no contaminants were present. The carburetor venturi was inspected with no anomalies noted. The spark plugs were removed and found to be unremarkable. Following removal of the top spark plugs, thumb compression was noted on all cylinders when the propeller was rotated by hand. The magnetos were tested on the airframe and sparking was observed on all leads in firing order. The 0953 weather observation at Ann Arbor, Michigan located 17 from the accident site recorded a temperature of 32° F and a dewpoint of 25°F. Based on the FAA carburetor icing probability chart (Figure 1), the atmospheric conditions at the time of the accident were conducive to the development of serious carburetor icing at glide and cruise power. Figure 1: Carburetor Icing Probability Chart (Source: FAA SAIB CE-09-35)