Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Cortland, IL
The accident airplane was being flown to the pilot/owner’s home after a replacement engine had been installed. According to the pilot, the maintenance facility had conducted about 4 hours of flight testing after the engine installation was completed. Additionally, the pilot flew 4 takeoffs and landings on the day before the accident flight. The airplane was fully fueled before the flight on the morning of the accident. After an initial flight of about 1 1/4 hours, the pilot and passenger landed for a short break. The subsequent takeoff and initial portion of the accident flight were uneventful. However, about 2 1/2 hours after takeoff, during cruise flight at 4,500 feet mean sea level (msl), the engine suddenly stopped producing power. The pilot’s efforts to restore engine power were not successful, and she executed a forced landing to a muddy field. The airplane came to rest on its nose, with damage to the fuselage and right wing. Examination of the airplane at the accident site determined that about six gallons of fuel were present in the left-wing fuel tank. A small, undetermined amount of fuel was present in the right-wing fuel tank; however, the right wing was damaged during the impact sequence. A postrecovery engine examination noted fuel in the carburetor bowl. The examination did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The total fuel capacity was 36 gallons, and the fuel consumption ranged from 5.5 to 7.0 gph. As a result, the expected fuel consumption for a 4-hour flight would be about 28 gallons. The investigation was unable to identify any cause for the loss of engine power during cruise flight.
Aircraft-Aircraft power plant-Power plant-(general)-Unknown/Not determined
On February 11, 2023, about 1406 central standard time, a Jabiru J250-SP light sport airplane, N592J, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Courtland, Illinois. The pilot and passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The accident airplane was being flown from Bomar Field/Shelbyville Municipal Airport (SYI), Shelbyville, Tennessee, after a replacement engine was installed. According to the airplane owner/pilot, the maintenance facility had conducted about 4 hours of flight testing after the engine installation was completed. Additionally, the pilot flew 4 takeoffs and landings on the day before the accident, before the return trip home to Waukesha County Airport (UES), Waukesha, Wisconsin. According to the pilot, the flight departed SYI about 0945 with full fuel. The pilot and passenger arrived at Ohio County Airport (JQD), Hartford, Kentucky, about 1100 for a short break. The preflight inspection and departure from JQD were normal. The pilot reported that, about 1406, during cruise flight at 4,500 ft msl en route to UES, the engine suddenly stopped producing power. The pilot noted that there were no warnings or other indications leading up to the event. After declaring an emergency and diverting toward the nearest airport, the pilot made 4-5 attempts to restart the engine. The pilot stated that the engine would start momentarily but then lose power 3-4 seconds later with the propeller coming to a stop after each attempt. In addition, the flight displays would turn on and off along with the engine with no usable information; however, the radios continued to function. The pilot attempted to divert to Dekalb Taylor Municipal Airport (DKB), Dekalb, Illinois. However, when it became apparent that reaching DKB would not be possible, she executed a forced landing to a muddy field. The airplane came to rest on its nose, with damage to the fuselage and right wing. Examination of the airplane at the accident site determined that about six gallons of fuel was present in the left-wing fuel tank. A small, undetermined amount of fuel was present in the right-wing fuel tank; however, the right wing was damaged in the impact sequence. The carburetor bowl contained fluid consistent with fuel. A postaccident engine examination did not reveal any mechanical malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation. Review of the airplane service manual revealed that the total fuel capacity was 36 gallons. The published endurance was 6.5 hours with a fuel reserve, and the published fuel consumption was 4.5 to 5.5 gph. The maintenance facility representative noted that the normal fuel consumption for the airplane is about 6 gph. However, during an engine break in period, fuel consumption can be as high as 7 gph. According to a representative of the airplane maintenance facility, the airplane’s EFIS systems will not operate below 10.5 volts. When attempting an in-flight engine restart using the starter, the EFIS systems will reboot due to the drop in voltage. Multiple attempts with the starter would have caused the EFIS to continue rebooting. The radios operate on much lower voltage and will continue to operate when the starter is engaged.