Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

June 29, 2023 · Supernal SUP83-1 · N283TD

California City, CA

Overview

Report Status
Probable Cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
June 29, 2023
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (1 uninjured)
Location
California City, CA
Aircraft
Supernal SUP83-1
Tail Number
N283TD
Operator
Supernal
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
DCA23LA340

On June 29, 2023, at 0805 Pacific daylight time (PDT), a Supernal, LLC., SUP83-1 unmanned aircraft system, N283TD, received substantial damage during a developmental test flight at the manufacturer’s test site. There were no injuries. The aircraft was operating with an FAA Certificate of Waiver (COA) 2022-WSA-213-SAC-REV1, under Exemption No. 20050 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2022-1757. According to the operator/manufacturer, the test flights were intended to expand the aircraft’s flight envelope from the previously expanded forward speed envelope of 8 ft/sec to 20 ft/sec. At the beginning of the flight test, hover checks were performed. The first hover was very stable, and during the second hover there were some oscillations that were not present during the first hover. In the second hover, while landing, the aircraft did not detect the ground and the rotors continued rotating and the aircraft oscillated a little. The crew-chief/observer then manually cycled the avionics power by removing the power jumper connector on front of aircraft and reinserted it to reboot the system, after which the GPS and telemetry were noted to be stable. The crew then proceeded to execute the steps for forward flight, and the aircraft remained in GPS fixed mode as it climbed to 20 ft above ground level (AGL) in a stabilized hover test. After the hover test and systems check, the decision was made to continue the test flight, so the pilot in command (PIC) turned the aircraft to the outbound heading and accelerated it. Upon reaching an acceleration of 9 ft/second the right inceptor, used to control the aircraft about its three axes, was then moved to the detent to capture the 12 ft/sec data point. The aircraft accelerated through the 12 ft/sec targeted velocity data point to the 16 ft/sec data point, at which time the PIC then pulled back inceptor to reduce the speed to the 12 ft/sec data point. During the acceleration and deceleration of the vehicle there were good stable responses to control inputs. The inceptor was then pulled back to achieve maximum deceleration to bring the aircraft to a stop, and the aircraft responded normally, stopping its forward velocity. The inceptor was then moved to the detent to enter the hover position, at which point all power was lost and all rotors stopped turning and the aircraft fell to the ground from a height of about 20 ft AGL. Upon impact with the ground the aircraft bounced and came to rest upside down. There was damage to the landing gear, fuselage, wingtip nacelles, wing booms, tailbooms, and empennage. The accident aircraft, a SUP83-1 unmanned aircraft system, serial number 002, manufactured in 2023, registered to TVPX Aircraft Solutions Inc., and operated by Supernal LLC., as a 25% subscale unmanned test aircraft used to research distributed electric propulsion technologies. The aircraft has six propulsors driven by electric motors that are powered by lithium-ion battery packs. The aircraft can perform vertical take-offs and landings and can be reconfigured to horizontal flight with lift being generated by its wings. The aircraft is controlled from a handheld transmitter by a remote pilot and monitored by a PC laptop ground station linked to the aircraft via telemetry radios inside a mobile trailer at the test site. At the time of the accident the aircraft had accumulated about 1.9 hours. The pilot was an FAA certified private airplane pilot, and reported 560 hours total flight experience, of which about 1 hour was with the accident aircraft. The test flight was also supported by a visual observer who was stationed near the pilot and one team member who was located inside the ground control station. The pilot, visual observer, and ground control station operator used hands free headsets to maintain communication during the entire event, and there were no communication difficulties. The test site for this aircraft is a privately owned area near California City, California, within the Hyundai Motor Group’s California Proving Grounds automotive testing facility. Surrounded by unimproved desert, the test area has a large, paved ramp area from which operations are conducted along with the supporting infrastructure appropriate for the operations of the site. Per COA, SUP 83-1 was permitted to fly within its test area up to 400’ AGL, remaining clear of both Mojave Air & Spaceport/Rutan Field Airport’s (MHV’s) controlled airspace, and the Edwards Air Force Base’s Restricted Area 2515. Weather was not a factor in the accident. At 0600 PDT the weather at MHV, located 6 miles from the test site, was reported as sky clear with winds variable at 2 kts, visibility 10 statute miles, and temperature 82 degrees. The operator/developer’s post-accident examination revealed that there was erroneous signal processing of commands from the handheld transmitter. The erroneous signal processing caused the high-voltage contactor on the vehicle to open, resulting in a total loss of propulsion power. Further analysis of the software and hardware revealed that the contactor command from the handheld transmitter was not filtered, which resulted in short-duration signal noise being unimpeded.

NTSB Probable Cause

Erroneous signal processing that resulted in a total loss of propulsion power.

Full Narrative

On June 29, 2023, at 0805 Pacific daylight time (PDT), a Supernal, LLC., SUP83-1 unmanned aircraft system, N283TD, received substantial damage during a developmental test flight at the manufacturer’s test site. There were no injuries. The aircraft was operating with an FAA Certificate of Waiver (COA) 2022-WSA-213-SAC-REV1, under Exemption No. 20050 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2022-1757. According to the operator/manufacturer, the test flights were intended to expand the aircraft’s flight envelope from the previously expanded forward speed envelope of 8 ft/sec to 20 ft/sec. At the beginning of the flight test, hover checks were performed. The first hover was very stable, and during the second hover there were some oscillations that were not present during the first hover. In the second hover, while landing, the aircraft did not detect the ground and the rotors continued rotating and the aircraft oscillated a little. The crew-chief/observer then manually cycled the avionics power by removing the power jumper connector on front of aircraft and reinserted it to reboot the system, after which the GPS and telemetry were noted to be stable. The crew then proceeded to execute the steps for forward flight, and the aircraft remained in GPS fixed mode as it climbed to 20 ft above ground level (AGL) in a stabilized hover test. After the hover test and systems check, the decision was made to continue the test flight, so the pilot in command (PIC) turned the aircraft to the outbound heading and accelerated it. Upon reaching an acceleration of 9 ft/second the right inceptor, used to control the aircraft about its three axes, was then moved to the detent to capture the 12 ft/sec data point. The aircraft accelerated through the 12 ft/sec targeted velocity data point to the 16 ft/sec data point, at which time the PIC then pulled back inceptor to reduce the speed to the 12 ft/sec data point. During the acceleration and deceleration of the vehicle there were good stable responses to control inputs. The inceptor was then pulled back to achieve maximum deceleration to bring the aircraft to a stop, and the aircraft responded normally, stopping its forward velocity. The inceptor was then moved to the detent to enter the hover position, at which point all power was lost and all rotors stopped turning and the aircraft fell to the ground from a height of about 20 ft AGL. Upon impact with the ground the aircraft bounced and came to rest upside down. There was damage to the landing gear, fuselage, wingtip nacelles, wing booms, tailbooms, and empennage. The accident aircraft, a SUP83-1 unmanned aircraft system, serial number 002, manufactured in 2023, registered to TVPX Aircraft Solutions Inc., and operated by Supernal LLC., as a 25% subscale unmanned test aircraft used to research distributed electric propulsion technologies. The aircraft has six propulsors driven by electric motors that are powered by lithium-ion battery packs. The aircraft can perform vertical take-offs and landings and can be reconfigured to horizontal flight with lift being generated by its wings. The aircraft is controlled from a handheld transmitter by a remote pilot and monitored by a PC laptop ground station linked to the aircraft via telemetry radios inside a mobile trailer at the test site. At the time of the accident the aircraft had accumulated about 1.9 hours. The pilot was an FAA certified private airplane pilot, and reported 560 hours total flight experience, of which about 1 hour was with the accident aircraft. The test flight was also supported by a visual observer who was stationed near the pilot and one team member who was located inside the ground control station. The pilot, visual observer, and ground control station operator used hands free headsets to maintain communication during the entire event, and there were no communication difficulties. The test site for this aircraft is a privately owned area near California City, California, within the Hyundai Motor Group’s California Proving Grounds automotive testing facility. Surrounded by unimproved desert, the test area has a large, paved ramp area from which operations are conducted along with the supporting infrastructure appropriate for the operations of the site. Per COA, SUP 83-1 was permitted to fly within its test area up to 400’ AGL, remaining clear of both Mojave Air & Spaceport/Rutan Field Airport’s (MHV’s) controlled airspace, and the Edwards Air Force Base’s Restricted Area 2515. Weather was not a factor in the accident. At 0600 PDT the weather at MHV, located 6 miles from the test site, was reported as sky clear with winds variable at 2 kts, visibility 10 statute miles, and temperature 82 degrees. The operator/developer’s post-accident examination revealed that there was erroneous signal processing of commands from the handheld transmitter. The erroneous signal processing caused the high-voltage contactor on the vehicle to open, resulting in a total loss of propulsion power. Further analysis of the software and hardware revealed that the contactor command from the handheld transmitter was not filtered, which resulted in short-duration signal noise being unimpeded.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time08:05 PDT
Nearest Airport0nm
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftSupernal SUP83-1
Tail NumberN283TD
Aircraft CategoryPlft
DamageSubstantial
OperatorSupernal
Operating RulePart 91
Engines6
Engine TypeElectric
Engine DetailsT-Motor · U13II KV130 · Electric · 24
Seats0

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (1 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured1
Total1
Crew 1Age 55 · Second Class · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind2 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point0 C
Altimeter0
Observation Time06:00
Weather SourcePILO

Appendix: Source Data